<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>World-Alignment.git/artifacts/vg_5k/region_oracle.json, branch main</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.blackhao.com/World-Alignment.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Visual Genome is capped: part correspondence buys 0.023</title>
<updated>2026-08-02T04:48:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>YurenHao0426</name>
<email>Blackhao0426@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-08-02T04:48:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.blackhao.com/World-Alignment.git/commit/?id=bd6f3b8d3368c6459d07df383bb0f1df734d8df0'/>
<id>bd6f3b8d3368c6459d07df383bb0f1df734d8df0</id>
<content type='text'>
Each VG region box is index-aligned with its own description, so the crop
can be encoded and paired with the phrase describing it -- part
correspondence by annotation, which is cross-modal supervision a deployed
system would not have. The cross-modal anchor bound goes 0.336 -&gt; 0.359.

So the two encoders do not covary at the part level either, and no
segmentation, aggregation, kernel or backbone repairs that. The 0.805
within-text ceiling was never the cross-modal ceiling; for this encoder
pair on this corpus the cross-modal ceiling is about 0.36 against the 0.9
recovery needs.

Six representational interventions this session were chosen without a
ceiling in view -- the same error being made on the matching side at the
same time. What replaces them is a three-number screening protocol that
runs before any pipeline is built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude &lt;noreply@anthropic.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Each VG region box is index-aligned with its own description, so the crop
can be encoded and paired with the phrase describing it -- part
correspondence by annotation, which is cross-modal supervision a deployed
system would not have. The cross-modal anchor bound goes 0.336 -&gt; 0.359.

So the two encoders do not covary at the part level either, and no
segmentation, aggregation, kernel or backbone repairs that. The 0.805
within-text ceiling was never the cross-modal ceiling; for this encoder
pair on this corpus the cross-modal ceiling is about 0.36 against the 0.9
recovery needs.

Six representational interventions this session were chosen without a
ceiling in view -- the same error being made on the matching side at the
same time. What replaces them is a three-number screening protocol that
runs before any pipeline is built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude &lt;noreply@anthropic.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
