| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 hours | Correction, same session: the width statistic does not survive its control | YurenHao0426 | |
| The replacement gate proposed this morning is refuted by a control run this afternoon. Independent noise lowers the correlation to 0.828 without narrowing the underlying signal and reaches the same measured width as a field whose captions omit one factor -- 15.7 against 15.0 -- with recovery at 94.7% and 5.6%. A second instrument built specifically to fix that, counting canonical directions that generalise to held-out scenes, fails the same way and rates Visual Genome highest of the three failing fields. Established: the correlation does not govern recovery, in both directions. Corpus overlap does control it -- the caption-suppression ladder is monotone from 96.4% to 0.0%. Not established: any statistic that predicts recovery cheaply. Documents corrected accordingly rather than quietly rephrased; the refuted claim stood for four hours and is recorded as such. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> | |||
| 22 hours | Corpus overlap sets the shared width, by intervention | YurenHao0426 | |
| Suppressing one factor block from the synthetic captions -- vision still sees the property, nothing else changes -- costs five shared directions and the entire result: 96.4% recovery to 5.6%, at a correlation of 0.830 that is higher than anything achieved on photographs. The synthetic world degraded to Visual Genome's shared width fails exactly the way Visual Genome fails, at a correlation Visual Genome never reaches. That closes the chain: how much of the same world the two corpora describe sets the width, the width sets recovery, and the correlation reports on neither reliably. Also records the Delta compute-node offline trap in DELTA_HPC.md, and marks the superseded verdict in NATURAL_RESULTS. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> | |||
