From 22acd2899958def0d103f11da49c2c4a499be773 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 21:37:55 -0500 Subject: The missing term was unary: omit-size solved at its ceiling in 1.4s Adversarial review of the artifacts found three of my numbers to be artifacts of my own code. All three reproduced here before acceptance: - anchor_bound presented probe rows in the same index order on both sides, so exact twins had their tie broken onto the diagonal. 0.997 -> 0.920 on omit-size. Fixed by scrambling the T-side presentation. - The truth is not a strict local minimum: 51 transpositions have exactly zero energy delta. fast_pair_descent only looked stationary because its break test treats zero as no-improvement. - scipy's FAQ takes no n_init, so it was swallowed into unknown_options and 'FAQ x30 restarts' computed bit-identically to plain FAQ. Replaced with a real restart loop over P0='randomized'. The blind ceiling for omit-size is 0.836, not 1.0: the text field has 51 exact transposition automorphisms, so T[s,s] is bitwise identical to T and no objective f(V, P T P^T) can separate an orbit at any order. Every synthetic accuracy was being divided by the wrong denominator. The fifteen failed solvers share one property -- all purely quadratic or purely spectral, none with a node-level term. Eight moments of each node's own field row, blended with the quadratic term through Frank-Wolfe, reach 0.837 with an energy gap of exactly zero. The term must stay in the loop: as a seed for pure-quadratic descent it scores 0.21, pinned through the iterations it scores 0.84 -- which is also why amplification plateaued, being itself pure-quadratic. Co-Authored-By: Claude --- .../eval_voteanchor_seed7.log | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 artifacts/spectral_frontier_probe/eval_voteanchor_seed7.log (limited to 'artifacts/spectral_frontier_probe/eval_voteanchor_seed7.log') diff --git a/artifacts/spectral_frontier_probe/eval_voteanchor_seed7.log b/artifacts/spectral_frontier_probe/eval_voteanchor_seed7.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8852244 --- /dev/null +++ b/artifacts/spectral_frontier_probe/eval_voteanchor_seed7.log @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +150 ICP solutions in 222s +lowest-8 (E, acc, r): [(0.6733, 0.008, 8), (0.6824, 0.027, 10), (0.6956, 0.031, 10), (0.6988, 0.016, 8), (0.7011, 0.074, 12), (0.7026, 0.023, 10), (0.7052, 0.004, 10), (0.7052, 0.012, 8)] +mean pairwise agreement among top-30: 0.046 + +--- ROUTE A (free readout of the same ensemble) --- + best-E member acc 0.008 -> after exact descent acc 0.012 E=0.6565 [5s] + descend 5 lowest-E, pick by energy: acc 0.043 E=0.6316 + +--- ROUTE B (the proposal) --- + m= 5 K= 12 kept= 12 precision=0.167 -> expansion acc 0.039 -> after descent 0.039 + m= 5 K= 25 kept= 25 precision=0.080 -> expansion acc 0.031 -> after descent 0.051 + m= 5 K= 50 kept= 47 precision=0.064 -> expansion acc 0.031 -> after descent 0.023 + m= 5 K=100 kept= 91 precision=0.044 -> expansion acc 0.031 -> after descent 0.023 + m=10 K= 12 kept= 12 precision=0.250 -> expansion acc 0.043 -> after descent 0.074 + m=10 K= 25 kept= 23 precision=0.130 -> expansion acc 0.035 -> after descent 0.043 + m=10 K= 50 kept= 48 precision=0.104 -> expansion acc 0.059 -> after descent 0.066 + m=10 K=100 kept= 87 precision=0.069 -> expansion acc 0.035 -> after descent 0.035 + m=30 K= 12 kept= 12 precision=0.417 -> expansion acc 0.094 -> after descent 0.180 + m=30 K= 25 kept= 25 precision=0.320 -> expansion acc 0.141 -> after descent 0.125 + m=30 K= 50 kept= 48 precision=0.229 -> expansion acc 0.215 -> after descent 0.816 + m=30 K=100 kept= 80 precision=0.188 -> expansion acc 0.148 -> after descent 0.195 + +E(truth)=0.3396 total wall 617s -- cgit v1.2.3