diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md | 19 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md b/notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md index 671c237..ad2d60b 100644 --- a/notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md +++ b/notes/37_wrapup_corrections.md @@ -68,7 +68,24 @@ form — still zero fitted parameters — tracks the ramp at 0.982 and isolates 0.977; the figure now shows measured (error bars), matched-init curve, ensemble geometric mean, and the init-seed band. -## 3. Related cleanup executed with this audit +## 4. e0 moment headline "0.4378/0.4403" not reproducible (retired) + +Found 2026-06-13 while building the master technical reference (note 42). +The figure `E_B[e_0] = 0.4378 +/- 0.008` vs hidden share `0.4403`, cited in +notes 29/35/36/40/41 and the old `paper/body.tex`, does NOT appear anywhere in +the current `actual_fa_initial_operator_moments/initial_operator_moment_rows.csv` +(6 widths {16,24,32,48,64,96} x 6 init seeds; no row or aggregate is ~0.44; +closest is width 16 init 0: predicted 0.4519 / empirical 0.4443). It is +presumed to come from a superseded run that was overwritten, or from the +AI-written draft. + +Retired. The reproducible Thm 3 evidence is the full 6x6 table (note 42 §6): +the no-fit prediction sits within Monte-Carlo error of the measurement, **max +|error| <= 0.008**, with predicted erosion spanning 0.15-0.45 (a wide-range +calibration, stronger than a single point). Living docs (36, 40, 41, README) +updated to this statement; historical notes 29/35 left as-is with this pointer. + +## 5. Related cleanup executed with this audit - `scripts/alignment_recovery_dynamics.py`: superseded probe (note 35); its divide-by-zero guard was fixed earlier but the rerun was never completed |