# Fixed-Width N-Sweep Probe The previous width-sweep short-SGD plot showed that tangent-kernel predictions were systematically above empirical FA/BP train gaps. A decomposition showed the main error source was not FA: \[ \mathbb E[L_{\mathrm{FA}}^{\mathrm{pred}}-L_{\mathrm{FA}}^{\mathrm{emp}}] \approx 0.008, \] while fixed-kernel BP was too optimistic: \[ \mathbb E[L_{\mathrm{BP}}^{\mathrm{pred}}-L_{\mathrm{BP}}^{\mathrm{emp}}] \approx -0.048. \] So the predicted gap was high mainly because the BP baseline was predicted too low. ## Revised Design Do not shrink capacity by shrinking width first. That changes two things at once: 1. the FA capacity margin; 2. the finite-width quality of the BP tangent-kernel approximation. Instead, keep the MLP width fixed and vary the number of training samples: \[ P-K_{\mathrm{FA}}-Nn_L. \] This changes the capacity margin while keeping finite-width BP bias roughly controlled. Probe settings: - width \(n=64\); - random-label regression; - \(N\in\{64,128,192,256,320\}\); - output dimension \(4\); - SGD, learning rate \(10^{-3}\), steps \(50\); - 2 init seeds and 4 feedback seeds per init. ## Result Combined output: `outputs/fa_tangent_kernel_fixed_width64_sgd_short_combined/fixed_width64_N_sweep_theory_empirical_overlay.png` The fixed-width probe improves the calibration: \[ \operatorname{corr} \left( \Delta L^{\mathrm{pred}}, \Delta L^{\mathrm{emp}} \right) = 0.983. \] \[ \operatorname{MAE}=0.0244. \] The linear fit becomes \[ \Delta L^{\mathrm{emp}} \approx 0.890\,\Delta L^{\mathrm{pred}}-0.008. \] This is much cleaner than the width-sweep fit: \[ \Delta L^{\mathrm{emp}} \approx 0.546\,\Delta L^{\mathrm{pred}}+0.044. \] The remaining bias is again mostly BP fixed-kernel optimism: \[ \mathbb E[L_{\mathrm{BP}}^{\mathrm{pred}}-L_{\mathrm{BP}}^{\mathrm{emp}}] \approx -0.020, \] with a small FA prediction bias: \[ \mathbb E[L_{\mathrm{FA}}^{\mathrm{pred}}-L_{\mathrm{FA}}^{\mathrm{emp}}] \approx 0.0045. \] ## Interpretation The earlier plot was not the cleanest validation of the theory because the width axis mixed capacity shrinkage with finite-width NTK error. The fixed-width N-sweep is the cleaner short-horizon validation design. This does not yet solve the long-horizon memorization transition. Short-SGD validates the local tangent-kernel distribution; long-horizon capacity transition still needs either a time-varying kernel theory or a separate alignment-dynamics theorem.