faeval.git/protocol/examples/__init__.py, branch master Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository. Add audit table example: protocol applied to BP/DFA/SB/CB/EP 2026-04-08T03:29:00+00:00 YurenHao0426 Blackhao0426@gmail.com 2026-04-08T03:29:00+00:00 111bab56e2d49c9fb1f3bfb9e55ea2028da4d008 5-method audit table on 4-block d=256 ResMLP CIFAR-10 seed 42: - BP: trustworthy (acc 0.615, h_L=2e2, g_L=4e-4, stab 0.099) - DFA: walked back via (a)+(b)+(d) — h_L=4e8, g_L=4e-9, undercuts frozen - State Bridge: walked back via all 4 diagnostics — stability 0.992 is the cleanest possible drift-dominated case - Credit Bridge: walked back via all 4 — stability 0.352, also drift mode - EP: trustworthy (acc 0.359, h_L=3e3, g_L=2e-4, stab -0.036) — paper's internal control case This is the §2 audit evidence for the main-track paper. Confirms that standard headline acc + Γ silently fails on 3 of 5 methods on this architecture, while the 4-diagnostic protocol catches all three. 
5-method audit table on 4-block d=256 ResMLP CIFAR-10 seed 42:
  - BP: trustworthy (acc 0.615, h_L=2e2, g_L=4e-4, stab 0.099)
  - DFA: walked back via (a)+(b)+(d) — h_L=4e8, g_L=4e-9, undercuts frozen
  - State Bridge: walked back via all 4 diagnostics — stability 0.992 is the
    cleanest possible drift-dominated case
  - Credit Bridge: walked back via all 4 — stability 0.352, also drift mode
  - EP: trustworthy (acc 0.359, h_L=3e3, g_L=2e-4, stab -0.036) — paper's
    internal control case

This is the §2 audit evidence for the main-track paper. Confirms that
standard headline acc + Γ silently fails on 3 of 5 methods on this
architecture, while the 4-diagnostic protocol catches all three.