<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>faeval.git/results/bp_with_penalty/bp_pen_lam0.01_s42.json, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.blackhao.com/faeval.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>BP+penalty control result: mode 2 (intrinsic credit quality) confirmed REAL</title>
<updated>2026-04-08T06:44:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>YurenHao0426</name>
<email>Blackhao0426@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-04-08T06:44:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.blackhao.com/faeval.git/commit/?id=032afbfc3ec3961748cc557f428d2fd6e4eda5d9'/>
<id>032afbfc3ec3961748cc557f428d2fd6e4eda5d9</id>
<content type='text'>
BP + lam=1e-2 ||f||^2 penalty trained for 30 epochs (s42):
  ep 30 final: test_acc 0.5303
  margin vs DFA-shallow 0.349: +18.13 pp

The 2x2 accuracy grid:
                  no penalty       with penalty
  BP             0.609            0.530
  DFA            0.308            0.363

Penalty effect on BP: -8 pp (capacity regularization cost)
Penalty effect on DFA: +5.5 pp (rescue from active harm)

Mode 2 (intrinsic credit quality) is confirmed REAL by this control:
even after the penalty's capacity cost, BP achieves +18 pp depth
utilization. DFA under the same penalty achieves only +1.4 pp. The
difference (~17 pp) cannot be attributed to capacity loss — it is
genuine credit-quality cost of random feedback vs true backprop
gradient.

This validates the round 19 'two distinct failure modes' framing:
mode 2 is not a penalty-induced regularization artifact.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
BP + lam=1e-2 ||f||^2 penalty trained for 30 epochs (s42):
  ep 30 final: test_acc 0.5303
  margin vs DFA-shallow 0.349: +18.13 pp

The 2x2 accuracy grid:
                  no penalty       with penalty
  BP             0.609            0.530
  DFA            0.308            0.363

Penalty effect on BP: -8 pp (capacity regularization cost)
Penalty effect on DFA: +5.5 pp (rescue from active harm)

Mode 2 (intrinsic credit quality) is confirmed REAL by this control:
even after the penalty's capacity cost, BP achieves +18 pp depth
utilization. DFA under the same penalty achieves only +1.4 pp. The
difference (~17 pp) cannot be attributed to capacity loss — it is
genuine credit-quality cost of random feedback vs true backprop
gradient.

This validates the round 19 'two distinct failure modes' framing:
mode 2 is not a penalty-induced regularization artifact.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
