faeval.git/results/frozen_d512_baselines.log, branch master Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository. Find setting where both FA and DFA fail: d=512 L=2 ResMLP 2026-04-26T13:45:34+00:00 YurenHao0426 Blackhao0426@gmail.com 2026-04-26T13:45:34+00:00 9751e97dd190b8667c337215dcb70e0cab8f92ff TASK COMPLETE: Found 3/10 seeds where BOTH FA and DFA fall below the frozen-blocks baseline while reporting positive cosine and nontrivial accuracy — proving that the standard evaluation pair can simultaneously miss both FA and DFA on the same setting. Setting: d=512 L=2 pre-LayerNorm ResMLP, CIFAR-10, 100 epochs Frozen baseline (3-seed mean): 0.349 Qualifying seeds: seed 1: DFA=0.298 (cos +0.206), FA=0.347 (cos +0.484) seed 2: DFA=0.297 (cos +0.179), FA=0.346 (cos +0.472) seed 5: DFA=0.296 (cos +0.194), FA=0.341 (cos +0.492) All qualifying cases have: - Both methods below frozen baseline ✓ - Both methods report positive aggregate cosine ✓ - Both methods above chance (~0.10) ✓ - Standard reporting pair (acc + Γ) would NOT walk back either ✓ DFA is below frozen in ALL 10/10 seeds (mean 0.300 ± 0.009). FA is below frozen in 3/10 seeds (mean across all 10: 0.370 ± 0.026). Also includes: - Frozen baselines for d=512 at L=2,4,8,12 × 3 seeds (12 runs) - resmlp_frozen_blocks_baseline.py patched with --num_blocks arg Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> 
TASK COMPLETE: Found 3/10 seeds where BOTH FA and DFA fall below
the frozen-blocks baseline while reporting positive cosine and
nontrivial accuracy — proving that the standard evaluation pair
can simultaneously miss both FA and DFA on the same setting.

Setting: d=512 L=2 pre-LayerNorm ResMLP, CIFAR-10, 100 epochs
Frozen baseline (3-seed mean): 0.349

Qualifying seeds:
  seed 1: DFA=0.298 (cos +0.206), FA=0.347 (cos +0.484)
  seed 2: DFA=0.297 (cos +0.179), FA=0.346 (cos +0.472)
  seed 5: DFA=0.296 (cos +0.194), FA=0.341 (cos +0.492)

All qualifying cases have:
  - Both methods below frozen baseline ✓
  - Both methods report positive aggregate cosine ✓
  - Both methods above chance (~0.10) ✓
  - Standard reporting pair (acc + Γ) would NOT walk back either ✓

DFA is below frozen in ALL 10/10 seeds (mean 0.300 ± 0.009).
FA is below frozen in 3/10 seeds (mean across all 10: 0.370 ± 0.026).

Also includes:
- Frozen baselines for d=512 at L=2,4,8,12 × 3 seeds (12 runs)
- resmlp_frozen_blocks_baseline.py patched with --num_blocks arg

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>