Re-ran protocol/examples/threshold_sensitivity.py and captured the
full output. This is the auditable source for:

  §6 ¶1 "63× calibration gap" between healthy max-per-block growth
        (EP s123 = 11.0) and degenerate min (CB s123 = 694)
  §6 ¶1 "24,338× gap" between healthy min ‖g_L‖ (EP s123 = 1.02e-4)
        and degenerate max (CB s123 = 4.18e-9)
  Appendix E threshold robustness: at default (a)>50× and (b)<1e-7,
    all DFA/SB/CB seeds fire and all BP/EP seeds pass

The threshold robustness band is wide: (a) verdicts only flip when
threshold goes above ~700× (CB s123 boundary) or below ~6× (EP s123
boundary); (b) verdicts only flip when threshold passes above ~1e-4
(EP s123 boundary) or below ~5e-9 (CB s123 boundary). The chosen
default thresholds (50× and 1e-7) sit in the middle of these wide
bands, confirming the qualitative-stability claim in Appendix E.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>