faeval.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2026-04-08	EVIDENCE_SUMMARY: §4 fully rewritten under locked two-distinct-modes framing	YurenHao0426
	§4 now reflects all 5 independent validations of the converged framing: 1. Direct deep cos on penalized DFA (3 seeds): +0.155 ± 0.025 2. Null calibration with fresh Bs: +0.002 ± 0.022 (real signal) 3. Hypothesis B disambiguation (vanilla early ep): -0.008 ± 0.013 4. BP+penalty 2×2 control: 17 pp residual = credit quality 5. Multi-seed lock-in: 24 measurements all near zero Round 20 language tightening applied: - 'lower bound on non-capacity gap' instead of 'clean isolation' - Explicit caveats about end-to-end vs local-loss difference - Counter to 'different optimization regime' objection The §4 framing is locked. Five independent validations done. Stop iterating, start writing.
2026-04-08	EVIDENCE_SUMMARY: add (d) threshold sensitivity finding (round 18)	YurenHao0426

2026-04-07	EVIDENCE_SUMMARY: round 18 language softening on CNN + penalty audit	YurenHao0426

2026-04-07	EVIDENCE_SUMMARY: add §3.7 CNN cross-architecture audit results	YurenHao0426

2026-04-07	EVIDENCE_SUMMARY: add §3.5 sensitivity, §3.6 cross-width, §4 ↵	YurenHao0426
	separability, figures section
2026-04-07	Add EVIDENCE_SUMMARY.md: consolidated snapshot of all protocol evidence	YurenHao0426
	Single-document overview of every result the protocol package has produced so far, with reproducibility commands and the file/memory entry where each result is recorded. Organized by paper section (§1 protocol, §2 audit, §3 decision utility, §4 temporal validation, §5 pitfalls). Includes the headline tables (3-seed audit, cross-architecture, penalty sweep) ready for the paper, and an explicit status field for each ongoing experiment. This is a reading guide for anyone (codex, future-me, the user) who needs to know what evidence is ready and how to reproduce it.