summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/protocol/PAPER_OUTLINE.md
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-04-08PAPER_OUTLINE: add 6th validation (perturbation correlation triangulation)YurenHao0426
2026-04-08PAPER_OUTLINE: round 20 language tightening + 5 validation summaryYurenHao0426
§4 updates per round 20: - Soften 'confirmed' to 'strongly supports' - Add §4.4 BP+penalty capacity-cost control with the round 20 phrasing: 'lower bound on residual gap under matched architecture/data/optimizer/ penalty, after accounting for the penalty's direct capacity cost in BP' - Add multi-seed lock-in to §4.3 (24 measurements all near zero) - List 5 independent validations supporting the converged framing The §4 narrative is now complete and the framing is locked.
2026-04-08PAPER_OUTLINE: §4 rewrite under 'two distinct failure modes' framingYurenHao0426
After the round 19 disambiguation experiment confirmed hypothesis B (penalty CREATES deep alignment, not just reveals it), the paper §4 needs to use the new framing: Mode 1: measurement degeneracy via terminal LN gradient cancellation Mode 2: low intrinsic credit-direction quality of random feedback Both modes are direct-measured (mode 1 by diagnostic (b), mode 2 by per-layer cos in the meaningful regime). The penalty partially alleviates BOTH modes. Neither is fully fixed. §4 rewrite includes: - The two modes (4.1) - Penalty causal validation with 3-seed cos (4.2) - Disambiguation: vanilla early-epoch cos table proving hypothesis B (4.3) - Why the residual gap is partial alignment (4.4) - Why this framing is paper-cleaner than prior ones (4.5) Walk-back chain extended to 7 entries, with 6 and 7 happening same-day and converging on the final two-distinct-modes framing.
2026-04-08Add PAPER_OUTLINE.md: §1-§6 draft reflecting round 17 + 18YurenHao0426
Comprehensive paper draft outline for the NeurIPS 2026 E&D submission: §1 Discovery-first hook (round 16 narrative arc): broken eval -> evidence -> metrics miss -> need protocol -> validation §2 Audit findings: 5-method × 3-seed audit, walk-back details, EP internal control §3 The diagnostic protocol: 4 diagnostics, decision-utility ablation, threshold sensitivity (with (d) fragility flagged), temporal validation, cross-architecture validation, sub-mode discrimination §4 Two failure modes: mechanism story + causal penalty rescue, with the round 18 softening (partial dissociation rather than full separability) §5 Pipeline pitfalls catalog: 7 bugs (incl. new #6.5 self-cosine fallback) §6 Reference implementation + Limitations / walk-backs section listing all 5 walked-back claims explicitly This is a working draft to make the next writing step concrete. Reflects all evidence collected through the round 18 follow-up.