From 8c661528e3f770e69d7a126fff95ca781f07fd87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 09:22:52 -0500 Subject: Round 38 CB+penalty multi-seed: confirm clean cos-vs-acc dissociation across 3 fixed-feedback methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit CB+penalty 3-seed (4-block d=256, 30ep, lam=1e-2): - acc 0.360±0.003 (same as DFA+pen, 9pp below SB+pen) - ||h_L||=5680±178, ||g_L||=1.9e-5 (HEALTHY) - layer-0 cos +0.652±0.005 - deep cos +0.679±0.008 (4x DFA+pen, 2x SB+pen) - deep rho +0.464±0.025 (6x DFA+pen) Final 3-method rescue comparison: DFA+pen: acc 0.363, deep cos 0.155, deep rho 0.080 SB+pen: acc 0.453, deep cos 0.322, deep rho 0.402 CB+pen: acc 0.360, deep cos 0.679, deep rho 0.464 Clean cos-vs-acc dissociation: - CB has 4x higher deep cos than DFA but SAME accuracy - SB has intermediate deep cos but HIGHEST accuracy - Alignment to BP gradient is NECESSARY but NOT SUFFICIENT for usable credit Paper updates: - §4 ¶4: now includes all 3 methods with numbers, adds 'cos is necessary but not sufficient' framing based on 3-method dissociation - Appendix K: adds CB+pen 3-seed rows + vanilla CB baseline for comparison - Main content still 9 pages exactly (within E&D limit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) --- paper/main.pdf | Bin 475396 -> 477256 bytes 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) (limited to 'paper/main.pdf') diff --git a/paper/main.pdf b/paper/main.pdf index 834f5da..c2510e5 100644 Binary files a/paper/main.pdf and b/paper/main.pdf differ -- cgit v1.2.3