From baa2827a91c931f0b886c8946ebb4a5eb424f853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 08:28:08 -0500 Subject: =?UTF-8?q?Round=2038=20paper=20update:=20=C2=A74=20+=20=C2=A75=20?= =?UTF-8?q?+=20new=20Appendix=20K=20with=20SB+penalty=203-seed=20result?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit CODEX ROUND 39 VERDICT: PAPER-CHANGING for SB; wait for CB multi-seed for CB claims. Round 38 3-seed SB+penalty (4-block d=256, 30ep, lam=1e-2): - acc 0.453±0.003 (BEATS shallow baseline 0.349 by +10.4pp -- FIRST non-BP method) - ||h_L||=302±8 (contained, not silenced) - ||g_L||=1.8e-4 (HEALTHY) - deep cos +0.322±0.007 (2x DFA+pen +0.155) - deep rho +0.402±0.015 (5x DFA+pen +0.080) Penalty rescue magnitudes (method-dependent): - DFA: +5.5 pp (0.306 -> 0.363) - SB: +24 pp (0.213 -> 0.453) - CB: +15 pp (single seed, multi-seed in flight) - BP: -8 pp (capacity cost, 0.609 -> 0.530) Paper updates: - §4 ¶4 NEW: Mode 2 has method-dependent severity within fixed-feedback family; SB+penalty is the first audited non-BP method to substantively use deep blocks via intervention; deep cos doesn't predict acc across methods (methodological obs) - §5 ¶3 EXTENDED: BP+penalty -> 3x penalty control (BP, DFA, SB) with all margins vs frozen-blocks baseline; BP-to-SB gap only 7.7 pp vs BP-to-DFA gap 17 pp - Appendix K NEW: full SB+penalty 3-seed table with vanilla SB and DFA+pen comparison Main content stays at 9 pages exactly (within E&D limit). Total 16 pages. CB multi-seed (s123, s456) launched in parallel (PIDs 576938, 576939) — claims deferred until those land. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) --- paper/main.pdf | Bin 466667 -> 474044 bytes 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) (limited to 'paper/main.pdf') diff --git a/paper/main.pdf b/paper/main.pdf index 3be679b..6f64e3b 100644 Binary files a/paper/main.pdf and b/paper/main.pdf differ -- cgit v1.2.3