From ffbb53cb59eeea47f7967c4b4654cf2ee73395a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 18:47:26 -0500 Subject: =?UTF-8?q?paper=20v2.31.13:=20=C2=A76=20=C2=B63=20(c)=20ranges=20?= =?UTF-8?q?replaced=20with=20audit-data=20ranges?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The (c) calibration ranges "0.05-0.18 healthy, 0.5-0.99 drift-dominated" overstated the separation. Re-aggregated from results/protocol_audit/audit_table_s42_s123_s456.json: Healthy (BP+EP) 6 values: [-0.036, -0.024, 0.087, 0.099, 0.114, 0.120] range = [-0.036, 0.120], median 0.093 (NOT "0.05 to 0.18" — has negative values, max < 0.18) Degen (DFA+SB+CB) 9 values: [-0.005, 0.035, 0.047, 0.250, 0.352, 0.436, 0.518, 0.561, 0.992] range = [-0.005, 0.992], median 0.352 (only 5/9 above 0.30, only 3/9 above 0.50) The (c) discriminator has substantial overlap between healthy and degen distributions on this metric — the paper already calls (c) a "sub-mode discriminator" not a binary detector, so the loose calibration is acknowledged in framing but the numerical ranges should match the data. Updated to: "healthy methods cluster near zero with all six BP/EP values in [-0.04, +0.12], while drift-dominated cases reach high tails up to +0.99, and 5/9 degenerate values exceed the 0.30 default cutoff". This is more honest and points at the audit JSON. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) --- paper/main.pdf | Bin 500971 -> 501154 bytes 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) (limited to 'paper/main.pdf') diff --git a/paper/main.pdf b/paper/main.pdf index 2ff8fd7..90882a6 100644 Binary files a/paper/main.pdf and b/paper/main.pdf differ -- cgit v1.2.3