From 60e5c8d2ca992e197b640c58a5ba276bb6299bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anonymous Authors Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:42:41 -0500 Subject: Remove non-paper judge keyword checks --- src/gap_pipeline/kernel_models.py | 18 ------------------ src/gap_pipeline/models.py | 18 +----------------- src/gap_pipeline/paper_pipeline.py | 3 --- src/gap_pipeline/pipeline.py | 2 +- 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/gap_pipeline') diff --git a/src/gap_pipeline/kernel_models.py b/src/gap_pipeline/kernel_models.py index f835473..0840af5 100644 --- a/src/gap_pipeline/kernel_models.py +++ b/src/gap_pipeline/kernel_models.py @@ -309,24 +309,6 @@ class JudgeVerdict(StrictModel): raise ValueError("reject verdict must identify a blocking issue") return self - def validate_coverage( - self, - dag: ProofDAG, - ) -> "JudgeVerdict": - missing_nodes = [ - node_id - for node_id in dag.node_ids() - if re.search( - rf"(? list[str]: - """Keep the judge input a sequence while making node coverage auditable.""" + """Keep the judge input as an ordered, labeled sequence.""" return [f"{node.node_id}: {node.method_label}" for node in self.nodes] @@ -217,21 +216,6 @@ class JudgeVerdict(StrictModel): raise ValueError("reject verdict must identify a blocking issue") return self - def validate_coverage(self, dag: ProofPlanDAG) -> "JudgeVerdict": - missing = [ - node.node_id - for node in dag.nodes - if re.search( - rf"(?