From c959c50eaeb932f96339a96fb42abfb247cc5aac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:15:48 -0500 Subject: docs: treat exact constant calibration as oracle --- RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md') diff --git a/RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md b/RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md index eaefe87..eb6a16f 100644 --- a/RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md +++ b/RAIN_EP_RELEASED_PROFILE.md @@ -97,14 +97,13 @@ the author's comparative ConvHopfieldEnergy32 network. Holdout accuracy was: | released state-dependent profile | affine SDIL, cadence 10 | 42.35% | | released state-dependent profile | exact oracle subtraction | 46.00% | -This is positive evidence that a local neutral measurement can rescue a -centered-EP learner from a damaging constant hardware offset: both local -correctors recover 45.45% from 10.00%, close to the 46.00% clean endpoint. -It is negative evidence for the stronger state-dependent claim at the frozen -R1 setting: affine SDIL is 1.50 percentage points below the matched local -intercept and 3.65 points below the oracle. The state-dependent result must -therefore be treated as unconfirmed until a paired multi-seed accuracy study -shows otherwise. No residual-bias diagnostic can override this endpoint. +The constant-offset rows are an implementation sanity check only. Because the +neutral observation is exact, measuring a strictly constant offset once and +subtracting it is already oracle correction; the matching intercept and SDIL +rows contain no scientific advantage. The only substantive R1 comparison is +the state-dependent profile. There, affine SDIL is 1.50 percentage points +below the matched intercept tracker and 3.65 points below exact oracle +subtraction. No residual-bias diagnostic can override this accuracy result. ## R2 paired-seed accuracy check -- cgit v1.2.3