From c8ae43fb284cf5be54066b4c0b5b17dcb088227f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:57:48 -0500 Subject: docs: name the retention test precisely --- RESULTS.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'RESULTS.md') diff --git a/RESULTS.md b/RESULTS.md index 7d60c4f..cd74107 100644 --- a/RESULTS.md +++ b/RESULTS.md @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ The `-1`-point retention margin was fixed in `experiments/finalize_claims.sh` be depth cells were generated. A paired one-sided t-test rejects the null that SDIL's mean d5-to-d60 change is at most `-1` point (`t(4)=5.030`, `p=0.0037`; one-sided 95% lower bound `-0.547`). The same complete analysis rejects that null for BP (`p=0.0359`) and FA (`p=0.0321`) but not DFA -(`p=0.2310`; lower bound `-1.211`). This is an equivalence-to-the-prespecified-margin statement, +(`p=0.2310`; lower bound `-1.211`). This is a non-inferiority-to-the-prespecified-margin statement, not a post-hoc test that the depth change is exactly zero. The mean-based nondominated frontier among local methods is DFA-d5 (`5.01 s`, `37.77%`), FA-d5 -- cgit v1.2.3