From 2fb10ac8e5a45e1b401640193427b7ac56f2b36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YurenHao0426 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:26:03 -0500 Subject: analysis: diagnose Oral-A calibration failure --- REVIEW_SCORECARD.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'REVIEW_SCORECARD.md') diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md index 861ba0e..df15681 100644 --- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md +++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Every formal result report records: | Current audited package | 5 | Strong depth-preservation and residual-necessity evidence; negative gates retained | Standard useful scale is absent | | Native baselines complete | 5 | BurstCCN is below its published endpoint; Dual Prop reproduces 92.46% versus 92.41%, with strict provenance and cost semantics | Fairness objection narrows, but SDIL gains no standard-scale evidence | | Oral-A A1/A2 | 5 | BP reached 91.62%; short channel-gated SDIL reached 41.98% versus tuned DFA at 37.16% | Development screening alone cannot raise the score | -| Oral-A A3 fails | 5 | Full ResNet-20 SDIL became nonfinite at epoch 90 and ended at 10%; DFA ended finite at 33.06% | Standard-scale and oral-A claims are closed; A4 remains untouched | +| Oral-A A3 fails | 5 | Full ResNet-20 SDIL became nonfinite at epoch 89 and ended at 10%; DFA ended finite at 33.06% | Standard-scale and oral-A claims are closed; A4 remains untouched | | Oral-A A4 | not opened | The prerequisite A3 gate failed | No oral-A confirmation claim is available | These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative -- cgit v1.2.3