diff options
| author | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-08-01 16:20:35 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-08-01 16:20:35 -0500 |
| commit | 735f9c7fd202d0eaed9183094d84d365e0e5404d (patch) | |
| tree | 075b5b9212568d9d956776ce47d911b8e055c105 /README.md | |
| parent | 08fd63b8fee62ccdc284380c9832900ee83f9ede (diff) | |
Test the new instruments; fix an O(1/n) bias in the degree decomposition
Four tests around today's additions. Two failed on first run and both
were worth having.
The degree decomposition left an O(1/n) residual on a field that is
purely additive: excluding the diagonal makes the two-way design
unbalanced, so one pass of row and column means does not remove a pure
degree effect. Swept to convergence instead. At N=256 the correction
moves the reported variance shares by under 0.001, so the refutation of
the hubness hypothesis stands unchanged -- but the instrument that
produced it now does what it claims.
The other failure was the test's own scale: two random 16-dimensional
subspaces of R^64 overlap above 0.7 by chance, which is why the real
measurements are made at N=256 where the null sits at 1.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
