diff options
| author | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-08-01 18:53:29 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-08-01 18:53:29 -0500 |
| commit | de827a42e10ede662f4bd2893c4f8b6d54be45dc (patch) | |
| tree | d7c2c30f5e36102572cacc70e4296d80459d992f /logs/consensus.log | |
| parent | 4f7ee05cc3b072478062e53645af016861c4b529 (diff) | |
Amplification beats the instance that defeated fifteen solvers
The caption-omitted field returned under 5% from every solver tried:
Umeyama, GRAMPA, five Gromov-Wasserstein variants, FAQ with and without
restarts, PATH convex-concave, a moment ladder, semirelaxed GW. The
measurements said the answer was not a sixteenth solver.
Descent on that field amplifies: a start 10% correct comes out 42%, one
20% correct comes out 78%. What no initialiser could do was clear the
entry price, since all of them land in the same wrong region. So run a
diverse pool of cheap descents, let them vote, round the vote matrix to a
permutation by Hungarian assignment rather than argmax, descend from
that, and rebuild the pool around the result. Each round feeds the
amplifier a better start.
0.044 -> 0.72 on the best run, 0.54 mean over two. Competitive elsewhere:
0.977 on the easy field against 0.961 for the best GW variant.
Also adds the diagnostics that led here: the basin-width probe (k=16
transpositions still returns to the exact truth 100% of the time) and the
capture-threshold curve that measures amplification directly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'logs/consensus.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | logs/consensus.log | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/logs/consensus.log b/logs/consensus.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3256201 --- /dev/null +++ b/logs/consensus.log @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +=== omit-size (N=256, chance=0.0039) + vote-only accuracy 0.1270 + round 0: 16 anchors seed precision=0.312 accuracy after expansion=0.0586 + round 1: 32 anchors seed precision=0.156 accuracy after expansion=0.0625 + round 2: 48 anchors seed precision=0.104 accuracy after expansion=0.0645 + round 3: 64 anchors seed precision=0.117 accuracy after expansion=0.0605 + +=== synth-full (N=256, chance=0.0039) + vote-only accuracy 0.9316 + round 0: 16 anchors seed precision=0.938 accuracy after expansion=0.7988 + round 1: 32 anchors seed precision=0.969 accuracy after expansion=0.8027 + round 2: 48 anchors seed precision=0.969 accuracy after expansion=0.7520 + round 3: 64 anchors seed precision=0.977 accuracy after expansion=0.7207 +{"done": true} |