summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuren Hao <yurenh2@illinois.edu>2026-07-03 05:56:50 -0500
committerYuren Hao <yurenh2@illinois.edu>2026-07-03 05:56:50 -0500
commitb83947778e2c776f757a07d4719b7ce961d7ed55 (patch)
treeb9cc01d7adda691d9156d9d04f4fb2f644674e96 /ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py
Initial commit: ept — backprop-free equilibrium transformer (EP)
Code (ep_run/), organized docs (docs/{method,campaign,hardware,outreach,paper}), analysis scripts (scripts/), ONBOARDING.md entry point. Large data/checkpoints git-ignored (share separately). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014FAPDWQ49M5Ye3NpTndTpn
Diffstat (limited to 'ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py')
-rw-r--r--ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py54
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py b/ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7682c50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ep_run/lt_ep_anderson.py
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+"""Decisive test for the Anderson idea: at LOW damping (expressive attention), can a fixed-point
+SOLVER (Anderson acceleration, DEQ-style) converge the free phase where plain fixed-step relaxation
+cannot? If yes -> we get convergence from the solver, not from suppressing attention with damping."""
+import math, torch
+from lt_ep_train import EQBlock, get_batch
+dev = 'cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu'
+torch.manual_seed(0)
+B, T, C, H = 16, 64, 128, 4
+blk = EQBlock(C, H, 256, T, attn_mode='real')
+idx, y = get_batch('train', B, T)
+xin = blk.embed(idx).detach()
+eps = 0.05
+
+
+def gmap(z): # relaxation map; its fixed point = the equilibrium
+ with torch.no_grad():
+ return z + eps * blk.force(z, xin).detach()
+
+
+def plain(z0, steps=200):
+ z = z0.clone()
+ for _ in range(steps):
+ z = gmap(z)
+ return ((gmap(z) - z).norm() / (z.norm() + 1e-9)).item()
+
+
+def anderson(z0, m=6, max_iter=120, tol=1e-6, lam=1e-4):
+ Bs, d = z0.shape[0], z0[0].numel()
+ X = torch.zeros(Bs, m, d, device=dev); Fb = torch.zeros(Bs, m, d, device=dev)
+ X[:, 0] = z0.reshape(Bs, d); Fb[:, 0] = gmap(z0).reshape(Bs, d)
+ X[:, 1] = Fb[:, 0]; Fb[:, 1] = gmap(X[:, 1].view_as(z0)).reshape(Bs, d)
+ Hm = torch.zeros(Bs, m + 1, m + 1, device=dev); Hm[:, 0, 1:] = 1; Hm[:, 1:, 0] = 1
+ yv = torch.zeros(Bs, m + 1, 1, device=dev); yv[:, 0] = 1
+ r, k = 1.0, 2
+ for k in range(2, max_iter):
+ n = min(k, m)
+ Gm = Fb[:, :n] - X[:, :n]
+ Hm[:, 1:n + 1, 1:n + 1] = torch.bmm(Gm, Gm.transpose(1, 2)) + lam * torch.eye(n, device=dev)[None]
+ alpha = torch.linalg.solve(Hm[:, :n + 1, :n + 1], yv[:, :n + 1])[:, 1:n + 1, 0]
+ X[:, k % m] = torch.bmm(alpha[:, None], Fb[:, :n])[:, 0]
+ Fb[:, k % m] = gmap(X[:, k % m].view_as(z0)).reshape(Bs, d)
+ r = ((Fb[:, k % m] - X[:, k % m]).norm() / (Fb[:, k % m].norm() + 1e-9)).item()
+ if r < tol or not math.isfinite(r):
+ break
+ return r, k + 1
+
+
+print("free-phase convergence: plain relax (200 steps) vs Anderson — real attention, eps=0.05")
+print(f"{'damp c':>7} {'plain_res':>11} {'anderson_res':>13} {'and_iters':>10}")
+for c in [0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0]:
+ blk.c = c
+ pr = plain(xin.clone())
+ ar, ak = anderson(xin.clone())
+ print(f"{c:>7.2f} {pr:>11.2e} {ar:>13.2e} {ak:>10d}")