diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/campaign')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/campaign/CASCADE_ABLATION_PLAN.md | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/campaign/CASCADE_ABLATION_PLAN.md b/docs/campaign/CASCADE_ABLATION_PLAN.md index a73f28b..277ebf1 100644 --- a/docs/campaign/CASCADE_ABLATION_PLAN.md +++ b/docs/campaign/CASCADE_ABLATION_PLAN.md @@ -568,6 +568,18 @@ direction), not training-under-fault; wave-2 = co-training with faults injected +### RESULT 65 (2026-07-28): THE LEAK INSTRUMENT WORKS — first reading +0.0685/6k at the +SAME state (20x the trajectory-averaged rate: front-loaded/self-adapting), screening battery 1 +in flight. Paired 6k segments from fw135m_bsign_s250000: BP tail val_mean 3.4982 vs EP-plain +3.5668. Caveats favoring conservatism: BP arm ran COLD momentum (weights-only resume) yet +still outpaced by 0.0685 -> underestimate of BP's edge; the trajectory-integrated gap accrues +20x slower (EP re-equilibrates along its own path — the leak is partially self-healing, which +is WHY the run survives at all). As a SCREENING instrument: 1.5h/arm, single GPU, huge SNR. +BATTERY 1 (all from s250000 warm, 6k, vs the two bars): leak_cent (centered — if the exact- +symmetric read still leaks, the entire estimator-bias family is out); leak_k8 (deeper relax — +cos said saturated, the leak may live below cos resolution); leak_f32 (amp share on the same +instrument, cross-check of the ~12% window estimate). + ### RESULT 64 (2026-07-28): NOT A PLATEAU — A CONSTANT-RATE RELATIVE LEAK, 4-5x wider at C768; every named suspect cleared AT PROBE RESOLUTION; the leak-rate probe is the new instrument. LEDGERS CLOSED: 72M BP n=3: 3.2884/3.2943/3.2820 -> mean 3.2882+-0.006. Honest 72M gap: |