diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'ep_run/solver_wall.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | ep_run/solver_wall.py | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ep_run/solver_wall.py b/ep_run/solver_wall.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee9bf73 --- /dev/null +++ b/ep_run/solver_wall.py @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +"""Wall-breaking probe. The EP ceiling I measured comes from: rich (thick) block is +non-contractive -> EP needs heavy damping c to converge the free phase -> damping suppresses +the very expressivity that made the block good. ESCAPE ROUTE: get convergence from a SOLVER +(Anderson accel, DEQ-style) instead of from damping. Decisive question: for the THICK block, +at LOW damping (expressivity intact), can Anderson converge where plain relaxation cannot? +If yes -> the wall is a solver problem, not fundamental. If no -> the rich block has no fixed +point to find and the ceiling is intrinsic to the EP/fixed-point requirement.""" +import math, sys, torch +from lt_ep_train import EQBlock, get_batch +dev = 'cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu' +torch.manual_seed(0) +B, T, C, H = 16, 64, 128, 4 +eps = 0.05 + + +def gmap(blk, z, xin): # relaxation map; fixed point = equilibrium + with torch.no_grad(): + return z + eps * blk.force(z, xin).detach() + + +def plain(blk, z0, xin, steps=200): + z = z0.clone() + for _ in range(steps): + z = gmap(blk, z, xin) + return ((gmap(blk, z, xin) - z).norm() / (z.norm() + 1e-9)).item() + + +def anderson(blk, z0, xin, m=6, max_iter=150, tol=1e-6, lam=1e-4): + Bs, d = z0.shape[0], z0[0].numel() + X = torch.zeros(Bs, m, d, device=dev); Fb = torch.zeros(Bs, m, d, device=dev) + X[:, 0] = z0.reshape(Bs, d); Fb[:, 0] = gmap(blk, z0, xin).reshape(Bs, d) + X[:, 1] = Fb[:, 0]; Fb[:, 1] = gmap(blk, X[:, 1].view_as(z0), xin).reshape(Bs, d) + Hm = torch.zeros(Bs, m + 1, m + 1, device=dev); Hm[:, 0, 1:] = 1; Hm[:, 1:, 0] = 1 + yv = torch.zeros(Bs, m + 1, 1, device=dev); yv[:, 0] = 1 + r, k = 1.0, 2 + for k in range(2, max_iter): + n = min(k, m) + Gm = Fb[:, :n] - X[:, :n] + Hm[:, 1:n + 1, 1:n + 1] = torch.bmm(Gm, Gm.transpose(1, 2)) + lam * torch.eye(n, device=dev)[None] + alpha = torch.linalg.solve(Hm[:, :n + 1, :n + 1], yv[:, :n + 1])[:, 1:n + 1, 0] + X[:, k % m] = torch.bmm(alpha[:, None], Fb[:, :n])[:, 0] + Fb[:, k % m] = gmap(blk, X[:, k % m].view_as(z0), xin).reshape(Bs, d) + r = ((Fb[:, k % m] - X[:, k % m]).norm() / (Fb[:, k % m].norm() + 1e-9)).item() + if r < tol or not math.isfinite(r): + break + return r, k + 1 + + +for mode in ['real', 'thick']: + torch.manual_seed(0) + blk = EQBlock(C, H, 256, T, attn_mode=mode) + idx, y = get_batch('train', B, T) + xin = blk.embed(idx).detach() + print(f"\n=== attn_mode={mode} === free-phase convergence: plain relax(200) vs Anderson, eps={eps}") + print(f"{'damp c':>7} {'plain_res':>11} {'anderson_res':>13} {'and_iters':>10}") + for c in [0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0]: + blk.c = c + pr = plain(blk, xin.clone(), xin) + ar, ak = anderson(blk, xin.clone(), xin) + flag = ' <- solver converges where plain fails' if (ar < 1e-4 and pr > 1e-2) else '' + print(f"{c:>7.2f} {pr:>11.2e} {ar:>13.2e} {ak:>10d}{flag}") |
