diff options
| author | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 05:15:23 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 05:15:23 -0500 |
| commit | 3e49631d6dbf6b66683cb7dac5ecf71df2ad7de0 (patch) | |
| tree | ee0a6a3f4550959fb352bfdb0dd2ce82d380fd8d /results/cifar10 | |
| parent | 2749679c46ab6d823aefa94e24162dc664a322f0 (diff) | |
Round 31: fill §6 Recommended Protocol + §7 Discussion prose; v2 content-complete
Six paragraphs total via codex round 31:
- §6 §6.1: measurement-validity-first ordering with 63x and 24338x calibration gaps
- §6 §6.2: minimal four-check protocol; decision-utility 0/5 vs 3/5 walk-back
- §6 §6.3: conservative asymmetry (BP/EP preserved, DFA/SB/CB walked back)
- §7 §7.1: scope claim — evaluation failure not algorithmic impossibility
- §7 §7.2: limits — CIFAR-10 only, observational LN interpretation, lower-bound BP+penalty control
- §7 §7.3: lesson — decompose evaluation question, position vs Jordan/O'Bray/Paleka
Compiles to 12 pages (main content 1-8, refs+appendices 8-12), within E&D 9-page main budget.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'results/cifar10')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions