paper v2.31.13: §6 ¶3 (c) ranges replaced with audit-data ranges

The (c) calibration ranges "0.05-0.18 healthy, 0.5-0.99 drift-dominated"
overstated the separation. Re-aggregated from
results/protocol_audit/audit_table_s42_s123_s456.json:

  Healthy (BP+EP) 6 values: [-0.036, -0.024, 0.087, 0.099, 0.114, 0.120]
                  range = [-0.036, 0.120], median 0.093
                  (NOT "0.05 to 0.18" — has negative values, max < 0.18)

  Degen (DFA+SB+CB) 9 values: [-0.005, 0.035, 0.047, 0.250, 0.352,
                              0.436, 0.518, 0.561, 0.992]
                  range = [-0.005, 0.992], median 0.352
                  (only 5/9 above 0.30, only 3/9 above 0.50)

The (c) discriminator has substantial overlap between healthy and degen
distributions on this metric — the paper already calls (c) a "sub-mode
discriminator" not a binary detector, so the loose calibration is
acknowledged in framing but the numerical ranges should match the data.

Updated to: "healthy methods cluster near zero with all six BP/EP
values in [-0.04, +0.12], while drift-dominated cases reach high tails
up to +0.99, and 5/9 degenerate values exceed the 0.30 default cutoff".

This is more honest and points at the audit JSON.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions