paper v2.37.2: §7 ¶2 soften the reference-impl extensibility claim

The v2.37 §7 ¶2 said "the protocol code in Appendix A is structured
to make these extensions a configuration change rather than a new
experimental design." On re-reading Appendix A, this overclaims —
Appendix A describes the reference implementation as organized around
4 claim types but doesn't explicitly say "extensions are configuration
changes". The "configuration change rather than new experimental
design" framing is aspirational, not verified.

Softened to: "The reference implementation in Appendix A is intended
to support such extensions at the level of training-recipe and
architecture-class configuration so the audit pipeline itself does
not need to be re-derived."

Now the §7 forward-looking claim only commits to what Appendix A
actually describes (claim-organized, four artifact types) plus a
modest "intended to support" caveat.

Page count: 20 (unchanged).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions