diff options
| author | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 05:18:38 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 05:18:38 -0500 |
| commit | 68cfa13af2f026b7ff388aae4420eba0f0db804a (patch) | |
| tree | 6f02841f579b83d2bdfd17badb3287b7db10603d /results/confirmatory/persample/credit_bridge_s42.csv | |
| parent | 3e49631d6dbf6b66683cb7dac5ecf71df2ad7de0 (diff) | |
Add depth-sweep evidence to §5 + Appendix H from existing d=512 L=2,4,6,8,12 data
The cifar_depth_scan_s42 results were already on disk but not surfaced in
the paper. Across L in {2,4,6,8,12} on the d=512 ResMLP, DFA's layer-0
cosine stays in [+0.39,+0.40] and its mean deep cosine stays within
[-0.005,+0.000], while BP retains a deep cosine of +0.94 even at L=12.
This rules out the 'too deep to receive useful credit' explanation:
making the network shallower does not reach the deep blocks any better.
- §5 paragraph 4: one-sentence depth-invariance summary citing the new appendix
- New Appendix H: Depth-Sweep Layerwise Profiles, with full table
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'results/confirmatory/persample/credit_bridge_s42.csv')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions