1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
# Dynamics Control Experiment Report
Generated: 2026-05-27T20:24:05
## Summary Table
| Model | Run | Status | Init | Final/Last | Delta | Best | Best Step | Vs Baseline | Evals |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| HRM | HRM baseline 10k | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6504 | 0.1328 | 0.6699 | 9000 | NA | 12 |
| HRM | HRM mixed volume-CF | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6562 | 0.1387 | 0.6660 | 7000 | 0.0059 | 12 |
| HRM | HRM Engelken interfloss | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6465 | 0.1289 | 0.6621 | 8000 | -0.0039 | 14 |
| HRM | HRM Engelken+KL interfloss | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6211 | 0.1035 | 0.6250 | 9000 | -0.0293 | 14 |
| HRM | HRM conservative Engelken+KL | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6367 | 0.1191 | 0.6777 | 7000 | -0.0137 | 14 |
| HRM | HRM late Engelken+KL | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6191 | 0.1016 | 0.6367 | 7000 | -0.0312 | 14 |
| HRM | HRM volume-envelope+KL | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6074 | 0.0898 | 0.6211 | 8000 | -0.0430 | 14 |
| HRM | HRM basin consistency | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6152 | 0.0977 | 0.6152 | 10000 | -0.0352 | 12 |
| HRM | HRM single perturbed CE | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6660 | 0.1484 | 0.6660 | 5000 | 0.0156 | 12 |
| HRM | HRM clean+multi perturbed CE | complete | 0.5176 | 0.6543 | 0.1367 | 0.6660 | 7000 | 0.0039 | 12 |
| HRM | HRM fixed-unroll baseline 50k | complete | 0.5176 | 0.5801 | 0.0625 | 0.6328 | 5000 | -0.0703 | 22 |
| HRM | HRM multi4 loguniform 50k | complete | 0.5176 | 0.5889 | 0.0713 | 0.6250 | 7500 | -0.0615 | 22 |
| TRM | TRM baseline 10k | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5762 | -0.0215 | 0.6621 | 2000 | NA | 12 |
| TRM | TRM mixed volume-CF | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5078 | -0.0898 | 0.6133 | 1000 | -0.0684 | 12 |
| TRM | TRM Engelken interfloss | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5195 | -0.0781 | 0.5977 | 0 | -0.0566 | 14 |
| TRM | TRM Engelken+KL interfloss | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5957 | -0.0020 | 0.5977 | 0 | 0.0195 | 14 |
| TRM | TRM late Engelken+KL | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5449 | -0.0527 | 0.5977 | 0 | -0.0312 | 14 |
| TRM | TRM volume-envelope+KL | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5508 | -0.0469 | 0.5977 | 0 | -0.0254 | 14 |
| TRM | TRM basin consistency | complete | 0.5977 | 0.2422 | -0.3555 | 0.5977 | 0 | -0.3340 | 12 |
| TRM | TRM single perturbed CE | complete | 0.5977 | 0.6191 | 0.0215 | 0.6582 | 2000 | 0.0430 | 12 |
| TRM | TRM clean+multi perturbed CE | complete | 0.5977 | 0.5918 | -0.0059 | 0.6719 | 4000 | 0.0156 | 12 |
| TRM | TRM fixed-unroll baseline 50k | complete | 0.5615 | 0.4971 | -0.0645 | 0.5947 | 22500 | -0.0791 | 22 |
| TRM | TRM multi4 loguniform 50k | complete | 0.5615 | 0.5508 | -0.0107 | 0.6084 | 42500 | -0.0254 | 22 |
## Floss Episode Diagnostics
### HRM Engelken interfloss
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.030840 -> 0.000022, lyap1 -0.1476 -> 0.0047, volume -0.1693 -> 0.0013, KL mean/max 0.000000/0.000000
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.019141 -> 0.000014, lyap1 -0.1208 -> 0.0017, volume -0.1357 -> 0.0005, KL mean/max 0.000000/0.000000
### HRM Engelken+KL interfloss
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.030840 -> 0.001082, lyap1 -0.1476 -> 0.0107, volume -0.1693 -> -0.0180, KL mean/max 0.645335/14.346942
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.007646 -> 0.000361, lyap1 -0.0588 -> 0.0122, volume -0.0812 -> -0.0068, KL mean/max 0.130172/4.959406
### HRM conservative Engelken+KL
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.030840 -> 0.046181, lyap1 -0.1476 -> -0.2018, volume -0.1693 -> -0.2144, KL mean/max 2.819328/11.853225
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.016849 -> 0.048128, lyap1 -0.0850 -> -0.2127, volume -0.1248 -> -0.2180, KL mean/max 1.228630/5.586896
### HRM late Engelken+KL
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.046401 -> 0.000793, lyap1 -0.1729 -> 0.0256, volume -0.1976 -> 0.0086, KL mean/max 0.418510/6.242658
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.007572 -> 0.001378, lyap1 0.0810 -> 0.0078, volume 0.0456 -> -0.0055, KL mean/max 0.132306/2.906027
### HRM volume-envelope+KL
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.000046 -> 0.000000, lyap1 -0.1476 -> -0.2818, volume -0.1693 -> -0.3005, KL mean/max 0.436240/8.779900
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.000801 -> 0.000000, lyap1 -0.1108 -> -0.2791, volume -0.1299 -> -0.2994, KL mean/max 0.112411/1.281256
### TRM Engelken interfloss
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.000883 -> 0.000047, lyap1 0.0089 -> -0.0011, volume 0.0023 -> -0.0047, KL mean/max 0.000000/0.000000
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.000257 -> 0.000006, lyap1 -0.0149 -> -0.0008, volume -0.0157 -> -0.0015, KL mean/max 0.000000/0.000000
### TRM Engelken+KL interfloss
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.000883 -> 0.000242, lyap1 0.0089 -> 0.0158, volume 0.0023 -> 0.0064, KL mean/max 0.309170/7.308133
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.000063 -> 0.000059, lyap1 0.0031 -> 0.0088, volume -0.0017 -> 0.0018, KL mean/max 0.086242/0.927036
### TRM late Engelken+KL
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.004981 -> 0.001447, lyap1 -0.0423 -> -0.0327, volume -0.0482 -> -0.0368, KL mean/max 0.296968/3.760708
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.002911 -> 0.001941, lyap1 -0.0540 -> -0.0372, volume -0.0538 -> -0.0426, KL mean/max 0.092765/3.175512
### TRM volume-envelope+KL
- episode 0 @ train_step 0: floss 0.000074 -> 0.000000, lyap1 0.0089 -> 0.0145, volume 0.0023 -> -0.0076, KL mean/max 0.286836/6.571321
- episode 1 @ train_step 500: floss 0.000000 -> 0.000000, lyap1 0.0055 -> -0.0251, volume -0.0009 -> -0.0281, KL mean/max 0.089595/2.901087
## Incomplete Runs / Process Snapshot
- No monitored experiment processes are active.
## Notes
- `Final/Last` is `final_acc` when present, otherwise the latest eval accuracy.
- `Vs Baseline` compares against the matching HRM/TRM 10k no-floss baseline.
- A complete report may still show partial rows if an experiment crashed or was interrupted.
## Next Experiment Questions
- Close the faithful-flossing loop before making a claim that flossing is ineffective. Required matrix: from-scratch baseline, direct flossing loss as negative control, faithful prefloss, faithful interfloss with separated floss optimizer steps, and optionally volume/spectrum interfloss.
- Treat continuation runs as screening only. Final claims about flossing should use from-scratch full training, because continuation can confound optimizer state, EMA horizon, puzzle embeddings, and data-order effects.
- Run GRM/PTRM after or in parallel with faithful flossing. This answers a different question: whether stochastic multi-rollout plus Q-selection is learning a low-dimensional stability/Lyapunov-spectrum observer.
- For GRM/PTRM, compare learned Q selection with lambda1 and top-spectrum-feature selection, and measure Q-score correlation with stability features.
|
