docs: register frozen oral B confirmation

2 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/PAPER_PLAN.md b/PAPER_PLAN.md
index e6c2465..483630f 100644
--- a/PAPER_PLAN.md
+++ b/PAPER_PLAN.md
@@ -149,6 +149,12 @@ numbering.
 - Residual decorrelation, decoder, and plasticity-lesion positives.
 - Wrong sign-inversion, error-magnitude dominance, and weak acute online
   lesion; desired velocity is unsupported.
+- Keep the original failed screen intact. The separately frozen recovery
+  factorizes learned causal role from within-episode performance innovation;
+  report it only if both its D4-gated development screen and untouched
+  6-task-by-5-model confirmation pass.
+- Even a complete recovery pass supports innovation-guided plasticity, not
+  online neural control: the recovery fixes `kappa=0` by construction.
 
 ### 7. Limitations and discussion
 
@@ -167,7 +173,7 @@ numbering.
 | “Depth does not help this task.” | Claim says preservation; C2 reports the learned-vectorizer failure; Oral-A A3 is retained as a failed standard-scale test | Fatal to a broad scaling claim; the paper must remain mechanism-focused |
 | “Local methods hide enormous extra work.” | Logical queries, MACs, peak memory, wall time, C3 confirmation, EP/native protocols | Hardware implementations are not all equally optimized |
 | “Weak baselines define the win.” | BP/FA/DFA/direct NP/FF/PEPITA/EP plus native BurstCCN and Dual Prop | Native reproductions are one seed and method-native, not equal compute |
-| “Harnett already proves the biological story.” | Oral-B preregistration and complete negative result | Biological contribution is limited without new data or a new passed prediction |
+| “Harnett already proves the biological story.” | Original oral-B negative result plus the separately frozen role/velocity recovery and untouched 30-record confirmation | No biological claim changes unless the recovery passes; `kappa=0` cannot support desired velocity |
 | “The fast controller is just an unreported contrastive phase.” | Paired neutral observation count and elementwise/wall cost are explicit; no task-nudged state, loss query, or reverse pass is used | The instruction-off microphase is a real assumption and weakens the single-phase biological claim |
 | “The gates were selected after results.” | Git-frozen protocols, untouched confirmation seeds, failed branches retained | Early inherited pilots predate the strict boundary and must remain labeled |
 
diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
index d5f3d96..57f91c4 100644
--- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
+++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
@@ -77,11 +77,13 @@ Every formal result report records:
 | Dynamic projection D2 | 5 | One frozen 20-epoch record reaches 83.58%, above clean KP's 82.66%, with all stability and cost gates passing | Short single-seed validation cannot establish the full scaling claim |
 | Dynamic projection D3 | 6 | All 19 frozen checks pass at 91.18%, within 0.44/0.08 points of BP/clean KP, with 0.9994 early alignment and 1.326x BP MACs | One validation seed cannot establish robustness |
 | Dynamic projection D4 | open | Before observing D3, a paired clean-KP/dynamic five-seed test protocol and executable gate were frozen | A complete D4 pass, with no seed replacement, is required for 7/10 |
+| Oral-B recovery R1/R2 | not opened | Role/velocity factorization passes mechanics; the two-rate R1 and untouched 6-task-by-5-model R2 gates are frozen before any recovery task endpoint | R1 remains hard-gated on D4; only a complete R2 pass can establish innovation-guided plasticity and move 7 to 8 |
 | Oral-A A4 | not opened | The prerequisite A3 gate failed | No oral-A confirmation claim is available |
 
 These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative
-result in the record and can lower the score if it invalidates a current claim. Oral-B does not get
-retroactively reopened by success on standard vision benchmarks.
+result in the record and can lower the score if it invalidates a current claim. The original
+oral-B branch remains failed and cannot be retroactively reopened by vision results; the new
+plasticity-only recovery must pass its own separately frozen R1 and R2 gates.
 
 ## Evidence-to-score log
 
@@ -111,6 +113,7 @@ retroactively reopened by success on standard vision benchmarks.
 | 2026-07-22 / `6b85249` dynamic projection D1 | The sole frozen training-prefix record passes 14/14 checks; a 0.0058 neutral residual is reduced to 3.0e-8 while weights, momentum, BN, and loss stay bounded | 5 → 5 | Establishes a nontrivial operator-stability repair, but training-only mechanics cannot change the recommendation |
 | 2026-07-22 / `9bc58d6` dynamic projection D2 | The sole frozen short validation record reaches 83.58% versus clean KP's 82.66% and failed controls' 10%, with 0.884 early alignment, zero queries, and 1.326x BP MACs | 5 → 5 | First positive standard-ResNet load-bearing innovation endpoint, but one short seed is insufficient; full D3 and independent confirmation remain decisive |
 | 2026-07-22 / `15c60d0` dynamic projection D3 | The sole frozen full validation record passes 19/19 checks at 91.18% versus BP's 91.62% and clean KP's 91.26%, with 0.9994 early alignment, zero queries, and 1.326x BP MACs | 5 → 6 | Resolves the primary full-scale objection and opens the already frozen D4 panel; one validation seed and narrow biological scope prevent a stronger recommendation |
+| 2026-07-22 / `32122d0` oral-B recovery freeze | Before any recovery task endpoint, the untouched 30-record R2 protocol, task-cluster uncertainty, original B1/B2 signatures, plasticity lesion, digest binding, and immutable analyzer are executable | 6 → 6 | Removes a preregistration gap but supplies no empirical evidence; R1 is still sealed behind D4 and confirmation seeds remain untouched |
 
 Future rows are appended only after an audited frozen stage. A score staying flat is informative:
 engineering, theory exposition, or visualization may make the paper more defensible without