baselines: complete native author-code audit

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/PAPER_PLAN.md b/PAPER_PLAN.md
index 1c958ff..1055738 100644
--- a/PAPER_PLAN.md
+++ b/PAPER_PLAN.md
@@ -43,11 +43,13 @@ as a limitation rather than a title claim.
 5. Report the frozen depth panel: SDIL changes by only
    `-0.214 +/- 0.349` points over 12x hidden depth while DFA alignment falls to
    `0.047`; qualify that flattened CIFAR is depth-flat.
-6. Report the failed standard-ResNet A3 gate as a limitation: short-run SDIL
-   beat tuned DFA, but the full recipe became nonfinite and did not open A4.
-   End with the supported scope: innovation is useful for soma-predictable
-   traffic, while learned feedback amortization and long-horizon stability
-   remain the useful-depth bottlenecks.
+6. Report native BurstCCN and Dual Prop as method-native context, including
+   their unmatched protocols and audited walls. Report the failed
+   standard-ResNet A3 gate as a limitation: short-run SDIL beat tuned DFA, but
+   the full recipe became nonfinite and did not open A4. End with the supported
+   scope: innovation is useful for soma-predictable traffic, while learned
+   feedback amortization and long-horizon stability remain the useful-depth
+   bottlenecks.
 
 The abstract should not mention the failed desired-velocity hypothesis unless
 the paper explicitly positions that falsification as a contribution. It must