results: pass residual mirror capture gate

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
index 93273ba..33ffb4e 100644
--- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
+++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ Every formal result report records:
 | Hierarchical task-scalar V4 fails | 5 | Stable calibration leaves early alignment near zero; higher rates explode to 58.5x norm or become nonfinite after 800 queries | Correct mechanics and the right spatial family are insufficient when one global scalar estimates 267,904 feedback parameters |
 | Normalized response mirror capture passes | 5 | Twenty local observations reach 0.446 early alignment and 0.915 feedback/forward cosine at zero task-loss queries | Strongly resolves the engineering bottleneck, but all credit belongs to an inherited weight-estimation baseline until innovation is load-bearing |
 | Normalized response mirror short gate fails | 5 | WM reaches 64.04% and 0.939 early alignment at 0.9968x BP MACs, but misses its two accuracy gates by under one point | Strong inherited baseline and useful warning that alignment is insufficient; full run and any SDIL scale claim remain closed |
+| Residual response mirror capture passes | 5 | RRM reaches 0.665 early and 0.730 all-layer alignment with 0.954 feedback/forward cosine after 20 zero-query local observations | Opens the frozen short accuracy gate, but remains inherited predictive weight estimation rather than SDIL evidence |
 | Oral-A A4 | not opened | The prerequisite A3 gate failed | No oral-A confirmation claim is available |
 
 These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative
@@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ retroactively reopened by success on standard vision benchmarks.
 | 2026-07-22 / hierarchical V4-1 | Four frozen-forward records: etaA 0.1 leaves early alignment near zero, etaA 1 explodes one feedback norm to 58.5x, and etaA 10 is nonfinite | 5 → 5 | Closes global-task-scalar calibration of the full hierarchy at the fixed budget; richer local information is required before another accuracy endpoint |
 | 2026-07-22 / response-mirror WM-1 | Four clean frozen-forward records; selected etaM 0.1 reaches 0.4461 early and 0.5422 all-layer alignment with zero task-loss queries | 5 → 5 | Opens a strong inherited-baseline accuracy test and isolates information source as the bottleneck, but supplies no Harnett-specific task evidence |
 | 2026-07-22 / response-mirror WM-2 | Two clean short ResNet records; selected WM reaches 64.04% with 0.9393 early alignment and 0.9968x BP MACs, missing both accuracy gates narrowly | 5 → 5 | Substantially strengthens the comparator and cost story, but closes its full run and demonstrates that high credit cosine alone is not a scale result |
+| 2026-07-22 / residual response-mirror RRM-1 | Four frozen-forward records; selected etaM 0.1 reaches 0.6651 early and 0.7303 all-layer alignment with controlled norms, zero task-loss queries, and 2.4458e9 MACs | 5 → 5 | Residual prediction removes much of the fixed-point estimator noise and opens the short task gate, but the gain belongs to an inherited baseline and does not establish somato-dendritic innovation |
 
 Future rows are appended only after an audited frozen stage. A score staying flat is informative:
 engineering, theory exposition, or visualization may make the paper more defensible without