docs: log evidence-to-score changes

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
index 4cae7a1..1978688 100644
--- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
+++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
@@ -61,3 +61,14 @@ Every formal result report records:
 These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative
 result in the record and can lower the score if it invalidates a current claim. Oral-B does not get
 retroactively reopened by success on standard vision benchmarks.
+
+## Evidence-to-score log
+
+| Date / revision | Evidence status | Overall change | Reviewer interpretation |
+|:--|:--|:--:|:--|
+| 2026-07-22 / `2304e83` | Audit of all completed frozen branches | baseline → 5 | Strong preservation/residualization core, but no standard useful-scale result |
+| 2026-07-22 / `c753f51`, `1b24c87`, `6d19078` | Existing 60-run innovation panel promoted to a strict main figure; conditional-projection and norm-direction identities made executable | 5 → 5 | Closes a presentation/theory objection and makes the narrow novelty legible, but adds no new held-out evidence and therefore earns no score inflation |
+
+Future rows are appended only after an audited frozen stage. A score staying flat is informative:
+engineering, theory exposition, or visualization may make the paper more defensible without
+resolving the empirical objection that determines the recommendation.