results: close shared-feedback feasibility screen

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/SHARED_FEEDBACK.md b/SHARED_FEEDBACK.md
index a7d34c2..8808dca 100644
--- a/SHARED_FEEDBACK.md
+++ b/SHARED_FEEDBACK.md
@@ -114,3 +114,21 @@ innovation, context lesions, and an explicit accounting of the extra clean-KP
 instruction wire.  Injected-bias or clean-KP scaling results cannot substitute
 for those checks.
 
+## S0 outcome
+
+The sole frozen run from clean source revision `b345784` fails the gate.  The
+architecture and identification checks worked: oracle reached `99.316%`
+validation accuracy, removing context reduced it by `22.998` points, the
+innovation predictor explained `95.06%` of per-cell context variance on
+average, its largest residual-context RMS ratio was `0.01553`, and it observed
+zero task instructions.  But the endogenous shared field did not obstruct
+learning.  Raw shared KP reached `99.023%`, innovation reached `99.219%`, and
+norm-matched raw reached `99.170%`.  The raw--oracle gap was only `0.293`
+points and the innovation--raw gain only `0.195` points, far below the frozen
+five-point requirements.
+
+This rules out the proposed sufficient condition: task-required ordinary
+apical activity can be large, necessary for inference, and locally predictable
+without producing a meaningful raw-learning failure.  This realization is
+closed without a context-scale, task, optimizer, width, depth, or predictor
+screen, and it does not open a scaling experiment.