diff options
| author | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-07-22 19:55:05 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | YurenHao0426 <Blackhao0426@gmail.com> | 2026-07-22 19:55:05 -0500 |
| commit | 661496c172a53d09c59951c642f1a468abb7f07e (patch) | |
| tree | 8555fcd5fa14bb619f4be843a96c3ae22e173020 /THEORY.md | |
| parent | 0008f2cd96c06bea98f43560867d93967c597711 (diff) | |
mechanism: separate BCI role from performance velocity
Diffstat (limited to 'THEORY.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | THEORY.md | 57 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -632,6 +632,59 @@ the loss-producing part of training. Endpoint alignment must be reported with the alignment trajectory and task loss. This is a standard tracking fact used to audit the mirror baseline, not an SDIL novelty claim. +### Why instantaneous gradient feedback cannot reproduce the BCI derivative sign + +The failed oral-B model calibrated its apical vectorizer to the instantaneous +negative loss gradient. Let `e_t>0` be the target-minus-cursor error during an +active trial and let `s_i` be the signed causal role of cell `i` (`s_i>0` for +P+, `s_i<0` for P-). With squared loss, the perfect calibration target is + +```text +r_i(t) = e_t s_i. +``` + +Consequently the P+ minus P- residual contrast is a positive constant times +`e_t`. Whenever current error is smaller in error-reduction epochs than in +error-increase epochs, the Harnett separability statistic + +```text +0.5 * [E(P+ - P- | error decreases) + - E(P+ - P- | error increases)] +``` + +is negative. Adding error velocity as an input feature does not fix this: +regression against `e_t s_i` still assigns the causal coefficient to error +magnitude and has no reason to assign it to velocity. The complete negative +36-run screen is therefore a structural falsification of that target, not a +learning-rate failure. + +A derivative-faithful candidate separates causal-role identification from the +temporal performance modulator. With Rademacher perturbations `xi`, observe +only the scalar cursor under antithetic state interventions: + +```text +z+ = s^T (h + sigma xi), z- = s^T (h - sigma xi), +q_i = ((z+ - z-) / (2 sigma)) xi_i. +``` + +Then `E[q_i]=s_i`; no task loss, gradient, transpose weight, or reverse graph +is used. Define the within-episode performance innovation + +```text +delta_t = |e_(t-1)| - |e_t|, +r_i(t) = delta_t * m_i, m_i approximately s_i. +``` + +Now the same separability statistic is positive by construction when both +improving and worsening epochs occur. More importantly, this is not merely a +metric relabelling: `delta_t` is the scalar outcome that modulates the local +eligibility update, while sparse causal perturbations amortize the +neuron-specific role vector `m`. Whether that three-factor temporal rule +actually learns, preserves residual decorrelation, and survives a plasticity +lesion remains an empirical gate. Direct online control is not implied; in +fact applying `r` as an immediate state correction would reinforce both good +and bad velocity signs and is therefore excluded from the first recovery. + ## 4. Hardware-independent complexity Let `H` be the number of hidden layers, `K` the perturbation directions per @@ -675,4 +728,6 @@ quadratic finite-sigma bias law; the smooth-descent step threshold; the conditional-projection Pythagorean identity and norm-matching direction invariance; neutral predictor convergence across `eta_P` and update counts; the multiplicative residual-coupling operator and its unstable positive mode; -and the task-fit teaching-signal absorption predicted above. +the task-fit teaching-signal absorption predicted above; and the BCI +instantaneous-gradient sign conflict versus the temporal-difference role +factorization. |
