summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/COUNTRIES_V3/ILKHANATE.md
blob: 83bf365b4afc6cfe202c1ddacc8542ce47972e36 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
# Ilkhanate (Persian Constitutional Empire) — V3 Start 1836

## Basic Info
- **Official Name**: The Ilkhanate / Dowlat-e Ilkhani (دولت ایلخانی)
- **Capital**: Isfahan (industrial/commercial capital) or Tabriz (traditional capital)
- **Head of State**: Ilkhan (constitutional figurehead monarch, Mongol-blooded dynasty but fully Persianized)
- **Government**: Constitutional merchant republic under figurehead Ilkhan. **Merchant Divan (parliament)** holds real power. **Shia Guardian Council** provides religious oversight. Evolved from "Glorious Revolution" of ~1575.
- **State Religion**: Twelver Shia Islam (state religion, but Sunni minorities in Arabia/East Africa)
- **Technology Tier**: 1 (Isfahan and Tabriz among world's most advanced cities — electricity, automobiles experimental, high-speed rail experiments, advanced chemical/pharmaceutical industry)
- **Population**: Large (Persia ~15M? + Iraq ~5M? + E.Anatolia ~5M? + Arabian coast + Central Asian vassals + Indian puppets + East African colonies)
- **Literacy**: High in Persian cities, moderate in Iraq/Anatolia, low in colonies

## Territory

### Core (Persian Heartland)
- **Persia**: Isfahan, Tabriz, Shiraz, Mashhad. Fully industrialized urban centers. Railway network complete. World-class universities and research institutions. Advanced chemical and pharmaceutical industry.
- **Iraq**: Baghdad, Basra. Second-tier developed. Oil potential (not yet fully exploited?). Mesopotamian agriculture + emerging industry.
- **Eastern Anatolia**: Mountain plateau, less developed than Persian core. Strategic military frontier vs Italian Empire. Garrison zone.

### Vassals / Dependencies
- **Khoqand Khanate** (Central Asia): Samarkand, Bukhara, Fergana. Vassal since ~1520s. Silk Road cities still wealthy. Sunni population under Shia overlord — managed tension. Cultural golden age legacy (Timurid astronomy, architecture).
- **Indian Puppet States** (NW India): Delhi region, Gujarat inland. Puppet regimes installed during Scramble for India (~1720s). Economically exploited. Hindu/Sunni population under Shia-aligned rulers. Resistance movements.
- **Sinai/Palestine**: Buffer zone vs Egypt. Military garrison. Minor strategic value.

### Colonial Empire (East Africa)
- **Sudan → Mozambique → South Africa**: Continuous coastal colonial chain from Red Sea to Cape
- Former Egyptian colonies (Sudan seized during Egyptian revolution ~1700)
- Swahili coast cities: Kilwa, Zanzibar, Mombasa — developed as trading hubs, increasingly "homeland-ified"
- **South African frontier**: Expanding, friction with declining Portuguese Cape Colony
- **Administered by chartered trading companies** (VOC-model, since merchant revolution ~1575) → transitioning to formal state administration
- East Africa is the Ilkhanate's growth frontier — raw materials, agricultural potential, settlement destination

## The Economic Crisis (Core Opening Challenge)

### The Bread Problem (大饼危机)
```
Root cause:
  Ilkhanate established bread subsidies during golden age (~1500s)
  → cheap flatbread for urban population (political stability tool)
  → Egypt was the grain supplier (Nile breadbasket)
  
  Then Egypt broke away (~1700)
  → grain imports from Egypt now at MARKET PRICE, not subsidized internal transfer
  → but bread subsidy to population CONTINUES (politically impossible to remove)
  → state treasury hemorrhaging money to maintain bread prices
  
  135 years later (1836):
  → still importing grain (from Egypt, India, East Africa, international market)
  → bread subsidy is fiscal black hole
  → "everyone knows it must end but no one dares end it"
  → last time someone tried to reduce bread subsidy → urban riots
  
  V3 mechanic: Bread Subsidy modifier
  → Removing it: massive unrest in Persian cities (Isfahan, Tabriz, Baghdad)
  → Keeping it: permanent fiscal drain, limits military/industrial investment
  → Gradual reform: slow reduction paired with welfare alternatives? Agricultural investment?
```

### Land Reform vs. Clerical Estates
```
  Merchant Divan (parliament) controls commerce and industry
  BUT: agricultural land still concentrated in hands of Shia clergy (waqf endowments)
  → Clerical estates are tax-exempt (religious endowment law)
  → State can't tax the most productive farmland
  → Merchants want land reform: break up clerical estates, tax them, modernize agriculture
  → Guardian Council (clergy) blocks this: "these lands are God's property"
  
  V3 mechanic: Land Reform decision
  → Side with merchants: +industrial efficiency, −clergy support, −legitimacy
  → Side with clergy: status quo, continued fiscal strain
  → Compromise: partial reform, satisfies neither fully
```

### Grain Import Dependency → India/Ganges Ambition
```
  Core problem: Ilkhanate can't feed itself without grain imports
  Solution 1: Reform agriculture (land reform, break up clerical estates)
  Solution 2: CONQUER more farmland — specifically the Gangetic Plain (India)
  
  Current Indian puppet states control NW India (dry, not great farmland)
  The REAL prize is the Ganges valley (Bengal/UP) — but that's contested:
    England holds the eastern coast + West Bengal
    New Song holds eastern Bengal (宣慰司)
    
  → Journal Entry: "Secure the Granary" — expand Indian puppet states toward the Ganges
  → Risks war with England and/or New Song
  → But would solve the food dependency permanently
```

## The Anatolian Question (Core Irredentism)

### Journal Entry: "Restore Anatolia"
```
  Western Anatolia lost to Italian Napoleon (~1815)
  Eastern Anatolia still held (mountain frontier)
  
  Irredentist claim: "Anatolia was ours for 300 years — we want it back"
  
  But:
  ├ Italy is a Tier 1 military power with dreadnoughts and machine guns
  ├ Anatolian frontier is mountainous — hard to attack in either direction
  ├ War would be catastrophic for BOTH sides
  └ Cold War is more likely than hot war (for now)
  
  V3 mechanic:
  → Diplomatic plays over Anatolia (crisis events)
  → Arms race with Italy (naval + land)
  → Proxy conflicts (support Anatolian resistance movements inside Italian territory?)
  → If Italy enters succession crisis post-Napoleon → WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY
  → Player can choose: exploit Italian weakness to retake Anatolia, or negotiate peaceful settlement
```

## Central Asian Affairs

### Khoqand Management
- Vassal for 300+ years but Sunni population under Shia overlord
- Silk Road cities still generate trade revenue
- Potential for pan-Turkic or Sunni nationalist movements
- Great Khanate (to the north, controls Kazakhstan) might try to poach Khoqand
- Western Protectorate (Song's Xinjiang) on eastern border
- Mongol Khanate (sparse, northern) — minor player

### Journal Entry: "Secure Central Asia"
- Tighten control over Khoqand (risk: rebellion)
- Or modernize Khoqand as a developed partner (cost: investment)
- Compete with Great Khanate for Kazakh steppe influence
- Compete with New Song for Xinjiang/Eastern Chagatai influence

## Indian Empire Management

### The Puppet Problem
```
  NW Indian puppet states:
  ├ Installed ~1720s during Scramble for India
  ├ Local puppet rulers (often descendants of Timurid-Indian nobility)
  ├ Hindu/Sunni majority under Shia-aligned puppet regime
  ├ Economic exploitation: raw materials flow to Persia, manufactured goods flow back
  ├ Resistance movements: Hindu revivalism, Maratha-equivalent guerrillas, Sunni scholars
  └ English colonial India on the eastern coast = constant rival
  
  V3 mechanic:
  → Tighten control: +resources, +unrest
  → Liberalize: −resources, −unrest, risk of puppet gaining real independence
  → Annex directly: expensive, provokes England
  → Focus on Ganges expansion: risky but solves food crisis
```

## East African Development

### From Trading Posts to Homeland
```
  Ilkhanate East Africa (~1575→1836): 260 years of presence
  
  Phases:
  1575-1650: Trading posts (Kilwa, Zanzibar, Mombasa)
  1650-1750: Chartered company control (VOC model)
  1750-1836: Transition to formal state administration + settlement
  
  By 1836:
  ├ Swahili coast cities: developed, mixed population (Persian/Arab settlers + Swahili locals)
  ├ Interior: plantation agriculture, mining, less developed
  ├ Sudan: inherited from Egypt's colonial era, being integrated
  ├ South Africa: frontier expansion, friction with Portuguese Cape Colony
  └ East Africa is becoming a "second Persia" — permanent settlement, not just extraction
  
  V3 mechanic: East African Development mission chain
  → Build railways (coast → interior)
  → Industrialize key cities (Zanzibar → processing hub)
  → Settle Persian/Arab colonists (change demographics)
  → Manage local resistance
  → Compete with England (from Indian Ocean), Portugal (from south), New Song (from east)
```

### South African Frontier
- Portuguese Cape Colony is declining (Portugal collapsed, Cape isolated)
- Ilkhanate expanding south along coast
- **Journal Entry: "Cape Colony"** — seize the Portuguese Cape → control the southern tip of Africa
- Risk: may provoke England (which also eyes the Cape as a strategic waypoint)

## Maritime Rivalry: Indonesia and Beyond

### Aceh and the Malacca Legacy
```
  History: Ilkhanate's Shia ally Aceh held Malacca ~1600-1700, then Song reconquered it
  Aceh Sultanate: destroyed/reduced by Song
  But: Aceh exile government exists (Ilkhanate-sponsored)
  
  V3 mechanic:
  → Support Aceh exile government's claim to Malacca (diplomatic pressure on Song)
  → Fund Muslim insurgencies in Indonesian islands (against Song-aligned Chinese polities)
  → Establish Ilkhanate trading posts in eastern Indonesia (already have some from ~1600s)
  → Goal: re-establish Indian Ocean → Pacific trade route bypassing Song's Malacca
```

### Australia?
- Ilkhanate's East African coastal chain extends far south
- Persian/Arab merchants know about Australia (from Indonesian outpost contacts)
- **Long-shot ambition**: establish a foothold on Australian west coast
- Competing with: Song (east/north coast), England (west coast), Kalmar (west coast)
- Realistic? Barely — but a Journal Entry option for an ambitious player

## Flavor: Persian Engineering Renaissance

### The World's First Motorway
```
  Persia's terrain: mountain passes, desert valleys, plateau
  → Road engineering is critical (more than flat-terrain countries)
  → Ilkhanate leads the world in:
    ├ Tunnel engineering (mountain tunnels for railways and roads)
    ├ Bridge/viaduct construction (spanning gorges)
    ├ Advanced road surfaces (precursor to modern highways?)
    └ Civil engineering schools (Isfahan Technical University equivalent)
  
  Flavor event chain: "Trans-Persian Highway"
  → Build the world's first high-speed road connecting Isfahan → Tabriz → Baghdad
  → Engineering challenges: Zagros Mountain tunnels, desert sections
  → Prestige project: shows the world Ilkhanate is still a technological leader
  → Practical benefit: military logistics, trade, national integration
```

### Cross-Arabian Railway
```
  Persian Gulf → across Arabian Peninsula → Red Sea (Sinai/Palestine → Egypt border)
  → Bypasses the Suez-equivalent problem (no canal? or is there one?)
  → Connects Ilkhanate's eastern and western territories
  → BUT: crosses tribal Arabian interior (need to pacify/negotiate)
  → AND: threatens the powerful shipping/merchant guilds (who profit from sea route)
  
  V3 mechanic: Railway vs Shipping interest group conflict
  → Build railway: +national integration, −merchant guild support
  → Don't build: merchants happy, but strategic vulnerability remains
  → Compromise: build railway but give shipping companies railway contracts
```

## Ethnic / Religious Map

| Region | Majority | Minority | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Persia | Persian (Shia) | Azerbaijani Turks, Kurds, Baloch | Low (assimilated ruling class) |
| Iraq | Arab (mixed Shia/Sunni) | Kurds, Assyrians | Moderate |
| E. Anatolia | Turkish/Kurdish | Armenian, Greek remnant | Moderate-High (Italian irredentism) |
| Khoqand | Uzbek/Tajik (Sunni) | — | Moderate (Sunni under Shia rule) |
| India puppets | Hindu/Sunni Indian | — | High (colonial exploitation) |
| Arabia | Arab (mixed) | — | Low-Moderate |
| East Africa | Swahili + settlers | Local Bantu peoples | Moderate (colonial) |
| Sinai/Palestine | Arab (Sunni) | — | Low (buffer zone, small population) |

**Key insight**: Unlike many empires, the Ilkhanate's CORE (Persia) has LOW ethnic tension — 500+ years of Mongol-Persian assimilation created a relatively unified ruling culture. The tensions are all PERIPHERAL (colonies, vassals, puppets).

## V3 Key Decisions

1. **Bread subsidy**: Reform, maintain, or find alternative grain source?
2. **Land reform**: Break clerical estates or maintain religious establishment?
3. **Anatolia**: Cold war, diplomatic play, or war of reconquest when Italy weakens?
4. **India**: Tighten puppet control, expand to Ganges, or liberalize?
5. **East Africa**: Develop as settlement colony or extraction colony?
6. **Cape Colony**: Seize from Portugal or leave it?
7. **Indonesia**: Support Aceh, fund Muslim movements, or accept Song's Malacca control?
8. **Trans-Persian Highway / Cross-Arabian Railway**: Prestige engineering projects
9. **Central Asia**: Modernize Khoqand or tighten control?
10. **Shipping vs Railway**: Maritime merchant establishment vs continental integration

## Relationships

| Country | Relationship | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Italian Empire | **COLD WAR** (primary rival) | Anatolian border, Mediterranean competition, mutual dreadnought fleets |
| England | **Rival** | Indian competition (coast vs interior), East African competition, but common interest in checking Italy |
| New Song | **Competitor** | Malacca, Indonesia, Indian subcontinent. But also major trade partner (Silk Road still functions) |
| Egypt | **Former vassal, current rival** | Lost Egypt ~1700. Wants it back (or at least its grain). Egypt resists fiercely. |
| Great Khanate | **Contemptuous neighbor** | Declining serf empire to the north. Competes for Central Asian influence. |
| Khoqand | **Vassal** | 300+ year vassal. Sunni tension. Strategic buffer. |
| India (puppets) | **Colonial subjects** | Exploited, restive, may rebel. England supports Indian independence movements. |
| Portugal (Cape) | **Target** | Weak, isolated Cape Colony ripe for seizure |
| Japan | **Distant rival** | Pacific competition. Both have Indonesian outposts. |
| Aceh (exile) | **Client** | Sponsored exile government, tool for Malacca pressure |
| Burgundy | **Neutral** | No direct interaction |
| France | **Potential partner?** | Both lost to Italy. Enemy of my enemy? |