summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/COUNTRIES_V3/JAPAN.md
blob: 9716ddea9bc1496eeb09022d058a4484d0d3d636 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
# Japan — V3 Start 1836

## Basic Info
- **Capital**: Edo (Tokyo equivalent)
- **Head of State**: Emperor (天皇, restored to symbolic centrality during Meiji-equivalent ~1700s)
- **Head of Government**: Prime Minister (首相, head of cabinet, elected by Diet majority — in theory)
- **Government**: Constitutional monarchy with Imperial Diet (帝国議会). Modeled on 150 years of political evolution:
  - ~1670s: Jianzhou forced opening → shogunate crisis
  - ~1690s-1710s: "Restoration" (維新) — emperor restored as symbolic center, feudal domains abolished, conscript army, centralized tax, industrial policy
  - ~1750s-1780s: Constitution promulgated, Imperial Diet established (elected lower house + appointed peers upper house)
  - ~1800s-1836: Mature but CONTESTED system — civilian politicians vs military establishment vs zaibatsu
- **Current political reality**: Taisho Democracy equivalent — Diet has real power, political parties exist, free press. BUT military retains special constitutional status (直接奏上権: military reports directly to Emperor, bypassing civilian cabinet). Zaibatsu (財閥-equivalent industrial conglomerates) dominate the economy and fund political parties.
- **State Religion**: Shinto-Buddhist syncretism (no significant Christian/Islamic presence — isolation legacy)
- **Technology Tier**: 1.5 (approaching Tier 1. Electricity in major cities, railway network on Honshu, modern navy with dreadnoughts, chemical industry)
- **Population**: Medium-large (Honshu + Shikoku + Kyushu core, ~30M?)
- **Literacy**: High (150 years of modernization, compulsory education system)

## Territory

### Home Islands
- **Honshu / Shikoku / Kyushu**: Fully industrialized core. Railway network. Modern cities. The economic engine.
- **Hokkaido**: Colonized ~1600s+. Agricultural frontier + mining. Ainu population marginalized/assimilated.

### Pacific Empire
- **Sakhalin**: Split with/contested by Jianzhou Republic. Coal mining.
- **Kuril Islands**: Japanese chain connecting to Kamchatka.
- **Kamchatka Peninsula**: Continuous coastal settlement. Fur trade hub. Naval base.
- **Aleutian Islands**: Trading posts, fur trade.
- **Alaska**: Significant settlement — fur trade + fishing + timber. Japan's most developed American territory.
- **Pacific Northwest (Columbia region)**: Outposts and trading posts. Not yet continuous settlement. Competing with Kalmar (from Atlantic side), English (expanding west), and New Song (scattered).

### Claimed / Contested
- **Sakhalin (full)**: Jianzhou holds south, Japan holds north. Both want the whole island.
- **Pacific NW interior**: Multiple powers' claims overlap.

## Opening Situation

### Strengths
```
  ├ 150 years of industrialization — deep institutional capacity
  ├ World-class navy (Pacific dominant)
  ├ High literacy / educated workforce
  ├ Pacific empire provides resources (fur, timber, fish, some minerals)
  ├ No internal ethnic tensions (homogeneous population)
  ├ Strong national identity (island nation, unique culture)
  └ Strategic island position (hard to invade)
```

### Weaknesses
```
  ├ Resource-poor home islands (limited coal/iron compared to England or Song)
  ├ Pacific colonies are FAR AWAY and thinly settled
  ├ Alaska/Kamchatka = expensive to maintain (long supply lines)
  ├ Silver economy legacy: transition to industrial economy still adjusting
  ├ Not quite Tier 1 yet (behind England/Germany/Song/Italy/Ilkhanate in some areas)
  ├ Jianzhou Republic rivalry: constant friction over Sakhalin/NE Asia
  └ Isolated culturally: 150 years open but still insular mentality
```

## Internal Politics: The Three-Way Power Struggle

### The Three Pillars (三すくみ)

**1. Civilian Politicians (政党政治家)**
```
  Who: Elected Diet members, party leaders, liberal intellectuals
  Want: Full parliamentary democracy (Diet supremacy over military)
       Civilian control of armed forces
       Expanded suffrage (currently limited to propertied males)
       Labor rights legislation (150 years of industry → massive working class)
       Peaceful trade-oriented foreign policy
  Base: Urban middle class, intellectuals, some workers, merchants
  Model: "We should be like England — parliament rules, monarch reigns"
```

**2. Military Establishment (軍部)**
```
  Who: Army generals, Navy admirals, officer corps, military academy graduates
  Want: Maintain military's special constitutional status (直奏権 = direct access to Emperor)
       Expand Pacific empire (Alaska, Sakhalin, Pacific NW → full territorial control)
       Increase military budget (dreadnought arms race)
       Jianzhou must be neutralized (Sakhalin, strategic threat)
       Korea should be vassalized (strategic buffer, resource access)
  Base: Military families, nationalist intellectuals, some zaibatsu (arms contracts)
  Danger: If civilian politics fails → military may stage coup (二・二六-type incident)
  Model: "The Emperor's sword keeps Japan safe — civilians are naive"
```

**3. Zaibatsu (財閥-equivalent industrial conglomerates)**
```
  Who: 4-6 major industrial-financial groups controlling steel, shipping, mining, banking, chemicals
  Want: Whatever makes profit — war if profitable, peace if profitable
       Government contracts (military and civilian infrastructure)
       Market access (China/Song, Korea, Pacific, international)
       Low labor costs (oppose worker rights legislation)
       Influence government through political donations and personnel
  Base: Big business, industrial managers, financiers
  Swing faction: allies with military (arms contracts, colonial exploitation) 
                 OR civilians (free trade, stable business environment)
                 depending on which serves profit
  Model: "Japan Inc. — the country is a corporation"
```

### Key Internal Reform Decisions

**1. Suffrage Expansion (普通選挙)**
```
  Current: propertied males only → maybe 10-15% of adult males can vote
  Reform: universal male suffrage → eventually women's suffrage?
  Civilian parties want this (more voters = more support for them)
  Military/zaibatsu resist (broader electorate = less controllable)
  V3 mechanic: standard V3 voting rights reform
```

**2. Civilian Control of Military (文民統制)**
```
  Current: military has 直奏権 (direct access to Emperor, bypasses cabinet)
  → Generals can torpedo any policy by appealing to Emperor
  → Cabinet can't control military budget or deployments
  
  Reform: subordinate military to civilian cabinet (like England's system)
  Military establishment: absolutely refuses. May threaten coup.
  
  V3 mechanic: If player pushes too hard → military faction event (attempted coup?)
  If player doesn't push → military may drag Japan into unwanted wars
```

**3. Labor Reform (労働改革)**
```
  150 years of industrialization → massive factory worker class
  Working conditions: long hours, low pay, dangerous (especially in mines/chemicals)
  Socialist/labor movements growing (influenced by European ideas via trade contacts)
  Zaibatsu: want to keep labor cheap (oppose regulation)
  Civilians: split (some support workers, some fear socialism)
  Military: suspicious (socialism = subversion)
  
  V3 mechanic: standard V3 labor rights + trade union legality
  Tension: push too far → zaibatsu withdraw support → economic disruption
  Push too little → worker unrest → strikes → productivity drops
```

**4. Treaty Port Abolition (不平等条約改正)**
```
  Jianzhou forced Japan open ~1670s → treaty ports imposed
  165 years later: most have been renegotiated/removed
  But possibly 1-2 remain as NATIONAL HUMILIATION
  
  Journal Entry: "Abolish Unequal Treaties"
  → Diplomatic play vs Jianzhou (and any other power with extraterritorial rights)
  → If successful: huge prestige boost, nationalist satisfaction
  → If failed: national anger → may strengthen military faction
  → Historical parallel: Meiji Japan's decades-long campaign to revise unequal treaties
```

**5. Colonial Policy (植民地政策)**
```
  How to govern: Hokkaido, Sakhalin, Kamchatka, Alaska, Pacific NW?
  
  Option A — Assimilation (同化): make them Japanese. Suppress local culture/language.
    Ainu, Aleut, Native American peoples forced to adopt Japanese ways.
    Cheap but brutal. Resistance and cultural destruction.
    
  Option B — Exploitation (搾取): extract resources, don't invest in local development.
    Fur, timber, minerals flow to Japan. Locals get nothing.
    Profitable but unstable. Colonial resistance grows.
    
  Option C — Development (開発): invest in colonial infrastructure, education, integration.
    Railways, schools, hospitals in Alaska/Kamchatka. Expensive.
    But: creates loyal colonial subjects, sustainable economy.
    
  V3 mechanic: Colonial policy decisions affect loyalty, development, and cost for each territory
```

### The Emperor's Role (天皇の役割)
```
  Emperor: above politics (officially), but can tilt the balance
  
  In practice:
  ├ Military uses Emperor for legitimacy ("serving the Emperor")
  ├ Civilians use Emperor for reform legitimacy ("the Emperor wishes modernization")
  ├ Emperor's personal views matter (reformist Emperor → helps civilians; conservative → helps military)
  └ V3: Emperor is an event-driven modifier, not a controllable faction
  
  Possible event: Emperor dies → succession → new Emperor's personality reshuffles political balance
```

## Core Gameplay

### Path to Tier 1: The Final Leap
Japan is ~90% of the way to Tier 1 industrial power. The gameplay is about closing that last gap:
```
  Need:
  ├ Secure resource supply (coal/iron — from where? Korea? Sakhalin? Pacific colonies?)
  ├ Develop chemical/electrical industries to match European leaders
  ├ Expand university/research system
  ├ Naval arms race: maintain Pacific dominance against English encroachment
  └ Grow Pacific colony population (currently thin)
```

### The Jianzhou Rivalry (Primary Regional Conflict)
```
  Japan vs Jianzhou Republic:
  ├ Sakhalin: both want the whole island (coal resources)
  ├ Kamchatka: Japan dominant but Jianzhou has continental-side posts
  ├ Trade competition: both export heavy industrial goods to Korea/Song/international market
  ├ Historical grudge: Jianzhou FORCED Japan open (~1670s) — national humiliation not forgotten
  ├ Military balance: Japan has navy, Jianzhou has land army + industry
  └ Neither can destroy the other — Jianzhou too industrial to conquer, Japan too naval to invade
  
  V3: Permanent diplomatic tension. Crises over Sakhalin. Arms race.
      If one side weakens (internal crisis) → the other pounces.
```

### Pacific Expansion vs Consolidation
```
  EXPAND: Push further into Pacific NW, claim more American territory
    ├ Compete with Kalmar/England/New Song for western North America
    ├ Expensive (long supply lines)
    ├ But: secures resources + prevents others from encircling Japan
    
  CONSOLIDATE: Develop existing colonies (Alaska, Kamchatka)
    ├ Cheaper, more sustainable
    ├ Turn Alaska from fur-trading posts into real province
    ├ Build infrastructure (railways in Hokkaido → to Sakhalin ferry?)
    └ Less flashy but more solid
    
  V3 decision: player chooses emphasis each era
```

### Korea: Ally, Rival, or Victim?
```
  Korea is Japan's neighbor — small, industrial, independent
  ├ Japan invaded Korea TWICE historically (~1590s) and both times failed
  ├ Korea remembers this — deep distrust
  ├ But: both face common threats (New Song, Jianzhou)
  ├ Alliance possible (anti-Jianzhou bloc? anti-Song bloc?)
  ├ Or: Japan could try to vassalize Korea (risky — Korea is armed and industrial)
  └ V3: diplomatic play between alliance and domination
```

### England: Pacific Rival
```
  England expanding in Pacific (Australia west coast, Indian Ocean, possibly Pacific islands)
  ├ English and Japanese interests collide in: Australia, Pacific NW, Indian Ocean trade
  ├ But also: common interest in checking New Song's maritime dominance
  ├ Anglo-Japanese alliance? (like historical 1902 Anglo-Japanese Alliance)
  └ Or: Pacific naval rivalry → arms race → possible war
```

## Flavor

### The 150-Year Modernization Legacy
- Japan's modernization started with HUMILIATION (Jianzhou forced opening ~1670s)
- Every generation since has been driven by "never again" mentality
- Military-industrial complex deeply embedded in politics
- "Catch up with the West/Song" is the national ideology — but Japan is nearly there now
- What happens when you CATCH UP? Identity crisis: what drives Japan when the goal is achieved?

### The Fur Empire
- Alaska/Kamchatka fur trade was Japan's first colonial economy
- Sea otter pelts = "soft gold" of the Pacific
- By 1836: fur populations declining (overhunting)
- Need to transition Pacific colonies from fur extraction → diversified economy
- Flavor events: fur trade decline, conservation debates, indigenous relations

### Cultural Crossroads
- 150 years of contact with Jianzhou, Song, Ilkhanate, Portugal, Korea
- Japanese culture: unique fusion (traditional + imported technology/ideas)
- But still deeply distinct from neighbors
- Literary/artistic flowering: woodblock prints of Pacific landscapes, samurai-industrial hybrid aesthetics

## Relationships
| Country | Relationship | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Jianzhou Republic | **Primary rival** | Sakhalin dispute, historical humiliation (forced opening), arms race |
| Korea | **Wary neighbor** | Historical invasions, but possible alliance against Jianzhou/Song |
| New Song | **Major power, cautious** | Song is much larger but Japan has naval edge. Trade partner + rival. |
| England | **Potential ally/rival** | Pacific competition but shared interest vs Song. Anglo-Japanese alliance? |
| Kalmar Union | **Pacific competitor** | Vinland + Pacific NW overlap. Minor friction. |
| Mongol Khanate | **Minor neighbor** | Sparse, weak. Japan could exploit or ignore. |
| Ilkhanate | **Distant trade partner** | Indonesian trading post connections. No direct conflict. |