analysis: diagnose Oral-A calibration failure

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
index 861ba0e..df15681 100644
--- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
+++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Every formal result report records:
 | Current audited package | 5 | Strong depth-preservation and residual-necessity evidence; negative gates retained | Standard useful scale is absent |
 | Native baselines complete | 5 | BurstCCN is below its published endpoint; Dual Prop reproduces 92.46% versus 92.41%, with strict provenance and cost semantics | Fairness objection narrows, but SDIL gains no standard-scale evidence |
 | Oral-A A1/A2 | 5 | BP reached 91.62%; short channel-gated SDIL reached 41.98% versus tuned DFA at 37.16% | Development screening alone cannot raise the score |
-| Oral-A A3 fails | 5 | Full ResNet-20 SDIL became nonfinite at epoch 90 and ended at 10%; DFA ended finite at 33.06% | Standard-scale and oral-A claims are closed; A4 remains untouched |
+| Oral-A A3 fails | 5 | Full ResNet-20 SDIL became nonfinite at epoch 89 and ended at 10%; DFA ended finite at 33.06% | Standard-scale and oral-A claims are closed; A4 remains untouched |
 | Oral-A A4 | not opened | The prerequisite A3 gate failed | No oral-A confirmation claim is available |
 
 These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative