docs: record oral B recovery boundary

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
index 4efdf72..483114c 100644
--- a/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
+++ b/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md
@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ Every formal result report records:
    but cost `68.4x` ordinary forward-equivalent work.
 3. Innovation was not uniformly beneficial for arbitrary endogenous top-down traffic, so the
    supported mechanism is narrower than the initial claim.
-4. The frozen oral-B screen falsified the desired-velocity and Harnett error-derivative claims.
-   A temporal-difference factorization repairs the sign algebra only; it has no task endpoint.
+4. The temporal-difference recovery solves the task, passes the plasticity lesion, and yields
+   30/30 positive sign inversions, but its untouched R2 panel fails residual outcome advantage and
+   longitudinal prediction. The broader Harnett-like population signature remains unsupported.
 5. The standard-network result inherits reciprocal KP and pays for a paired neutral microphase.
    D4 establishes the innovation operation, not a new credit-transport mechanism or a literal
    cortical implementation.
@@ -81,14 +82,15 @@ Every formal result report records:
 | Dynamic projection D2 | 5 | One frozen 20-epoch record reaches 83.58%, above clean KP's 82.66%, with all stability and cost gates passing | Short single-seed validation cannot establish the full scaling claim |
 | Dynamic projection D3 | 6 | All 19 frozen checks pass at 91.18%, within 0.44/0.08 points of BP/clean KP, with 0.9994 early alignment and 1.326x BP MACs | One validation seed cannot establish robustness |
 | Dynamic projection D4 | 7 | All ten untouched records pass: dynamic 91.584% versus clean KP 91.388%, paired upper deficit bound 0.131 points, early alignment 0.999687, and no invariant failures | Establishes ResNet-20 robustness/noninferiority, not positive depth utility |
-| Oral-B recovery R1/R2 | R1 open | Role/velocity factorization passes mechanics; the two-rate R1 and untouched 6-task-by-5-model R2 gates were frozen before any recovery task endpoint | Only a complete R2 pass can establish innovation-guided plasticity and move 7 to 8 |
-| Oral-A dynamic depth recovery | not opened | A 60-cell ResNet-20/32/56 BP/DFA/clean-KP/dynamic panel, positive-depth-benefit gate, mechanism invariants, and fair cost bounds are frozen before any new endpoint | It is hard-gated on D4 and oral-B R2; only a complete pass can establish standard-depth scaling and move 8 to 9 |
+| Oral-B recovery R1/R2 | failed at R2 | R1 selects eta 0.1 with 98.05% worst-task success; untouched R2 retains 99.53% mean success and 30/30 positive signs but fails outcome-vectorization and longitudinal gates | Score remains 7; the joint oral-B claim is not established |
+| Oral-A dynamic depth recovery | closed | A 60-cell ResNet-20/32/56 BP/DFA/clean-KP/dynamic panel was frozen before any new endpoint | Its oral-B R2 prerequisite failed, so none of the 50 new cells may run |
 | Oral-A A4 | not opened | The prerequisite A3 gate failed | No oral-A confirmation claim is available |
 
 These are conditional reviewer forecasts, not promised scores. A failed stage leaves its negative
 result in the record and can lower the score if it invalidates a current claim. The original
-oral-B branch remains failed and cannot be retroactively reopened by vision results; the new
-plasticity-only recovery must pass its own separately frozen R1 and R2 gates.
+oral-B branch remains failed and cannot be retroactively reopened by vision results. The
+plasticity-only recovery passes R1 but fails its separately frozen R2 joint gate, so oral-A
+remains closed.
 
 ## Evidence-to-score log
 
@@ -121,6 +123,8 @@ plasticity-only recovery must pass its own separately frozen R1 and R2 gates.
 | 2026-07-22 / `32122d0` oral-B recovery freeze | Before any recovery task endpoint, the untouched 30-record R2 protocol, task-cluster uncertainty, original B1/B2 signatures, plasticity lesion, digest binding, and immutable analyzer are executable | 6 → 6 | Removes a preregistration gap but supplies no empirical evidence; R1 is still sealed behind D4 and confirmation seeds remain untouched |
 | 2026-07-22 / `1853620` oral-A recovery freeze | Before any new standard-depth endpoint, a D4-reusing 60-cell ResNet-20/32/56 panel and exact runner/analyzer contract are executable, with BP/DFA/KP controls, positive depth gain, alignment, projection, query, MAC, and memory gates | 6 → 6 | Precommits the final oral claim without bypassing the required sequence; no experiment opens unless D4 reaches 7 and oral-B R2 reaches 8 |
 | 2026-07-23 / `2fed62a` dynamic projection D4 | All ten untouched paired test records pass the frozen gate: dynamic 91.584% versus clean KP 91.388%, clean-minus-dynamic upper bound 0.131 points, 0.999687 early alignment, and zero invariant failures | 6 → 7 | Establishes the strict accept bar with independent ResNet-20 robustness/noninferiority; opens oral-B R1 but does not support added-depth or desired-velocity claims |
+| 2026-07-23 / `1ff7cb7` oral-B recovery R1 | The complete two-rate development grid selects eta 0.1; all 30 seed-level checks pass, with 98.05% worst-task final success, positive sign inversion, and 0.945 minimum role cosine | 7 → 7 | Strong development support for the repaired causal-role/velocity factorization, but R1 cannot change the score and only opens untouched R2 |
+| 2026-07-23 / `03c94a1` oral-B recovery R2 | Thirty untouched records retain 99.53% mean success, 90.45-point gain, 30/30 positive signs, and strong decorrelation, but fail seven population-vectorization/longitudinal checks | 7 → 7 | The recovery fixes learning, causal role, and sign but not the broader Harnett-like signature; oral-B and oral-A close without threshold repair |
 
 Future rows are appended only after an audited frozen stage. A score staying flat is informative:
 engineering, theory exposition, or visualization may make the paper more defensible without